Deprivation and access to treatment for colorectal cancer in southeast Scotland 2003–2009. (February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Paterson, H. M.; Mander, B. J.; Muir, P.; Phillips, H. A.; Wild, S. H.
• Is Part Of: Colorectal disease. Volume 16:Number 2(2014)
• Page Start: O51
• Page End: O57
• Publication Date: 2014-02
• Subjects: Colon (Anatomy) -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Rectum -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.34
• DOI: 10.1111/codi.12442
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-8910

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="codi12442-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="codi12442-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with poorer survival from colorectal cancer. We examined the association of deprivation with access to treatment, disease stage at presentation and choice of treatment for colorectal cancer within a regional managed clinical network.</p> </sec> <sec id="codi12442-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Method</title> <p>We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the Southeast Scotland Cancer Network colorectal database for the period 2003–2009. Socioeconomic status was assigned into five categories using postcode of residence and the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation score. Outcomes were access to consultation and treatment, stage of disease at presentation and treatment factors (type of surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy).</p> </sec> <sec id="codi12442-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Of 4960 colorectal cancer patients, 4016 patients (81%) underwent operative treatment. Deprivation was not associated with age, gender, tumour site, disease stage, delay in treatment pathway or permanent stoma rate. Primary tumour resection (<italic>P </italic>= 0.006) and chemotherapy treatment (<italic>P </italic>= 0.018) were higher in the least deprived compared with the most deprived quintile. Socioeconomic status was associated with both primary tumour resection [odds ratio for the most affluent compared with the most deprived quintiles (OR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–1.72, <italic>P </italic>= 0.018] and chemotherapy treatment (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.15–1.80, <italic>P </italic>= 0.001). However, when health board of treatment was added to the model, only chemotherapy treatment was independently associated with deprivation (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.16–1.83, <italic>P </italic>= 0.001).</p> </sec> <sec id="codi12442-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Deprivation is not associated with treatment delay or more advanced disease stage at presentation. An apparent association between deprivation and treatment choice may be explained by other differences between patients treated in different areas.</p> </sec> </abstract>