Evaluation of HbA1c criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: a retrospective study of 12 785 type 2 Saudi male patients. (February 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluation of HbA1c criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: a retrospective study of 12 785 type 2 Saudi male patients. (February 2014)
- Main Title:
- Evaluation of HbA1c criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: a retrospective study of 12 785 type 2 Saudi male patients
- Authors:
- Khan, Haseeb Ahmad
Ola, Mohammad Shamsul
Alhomida, Abdullah Saleh
Sobki, Samia Hasan
Khan, Shoukat Ali - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Recently, American Diabetic Association has recommended glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c ≥6.5%) as an alternate to fasting plasma glucose (FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L) for diagnosis of diabetes. However, studies from different groups showed inconsistent results with the use of HbA1c criteria. We examined the validity of HbA1c cut-point of 6.5% for diagnosis of diabetes. A total of 12 785 male diabetic patients (FGP ≥7.0 mmol/L), aged 56.27 ± 13.32 years were included. The average values of FPG and HbA1c of all the 12 785 patients were 10.127 ± 0.026 mmol/L and 8.729 ± 0.013%, respectively. Sub-grouping of patients into different age categories showed significantly high levels of FPG (10.934 ± 0.123 mmol/L) in the youngest group (age, ≥20–35 years) as compared to FPG (ranged from 10.021 ± 0.052 to 10.190 ± 0.050 mmol/L) in patients with other age categories. The level of HbA1c was highest in the youngest group (8.809 ± 0.056%) and lowest in the oldest group (8.653 ± 0.082%). There was a significant correlation between FPG and HbA1c (<italic>R</italic> = 0.571, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). There were 484 patients below the diagnostic threshold (HbA1c &lt;6.5%), resulting in 3.78% false negative predictions. Majority of the false negative patients were in the age group of 40–75 years and had borderline FPG (7.0–8.0 mmol/L) and HbA1c (6.0–6.5%). These findings suggest that Saudi individuals with HbA1c between 6.0% and 6.5% may be considered as "probable<abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Recently, American Diabetic Association has recommended glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c ≥6.5%) as an alternate to fasting plasma glucose (FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L) for diagnosis of diabetes. However, studies from different groups showed inconsistent results with the use of HbA1c criteria. We examined the validity of HbA1c cut-point of 6.5% for diagnosis of diabetes. A total of 12 785 male diabetic patients (FGP ≥7.0 mmol/L), aged 56.27 ± 13.32 years were included. The average values of FPG and HbA1c of all the 12 785 patients were 10.127 ± 0.026 mmol/L and 8.729 ± 0.013%, respectively. Sub-grouping of patients into different age categories showed significantly high levels of FPG (10.934 ± 0.123 mmol/L) in the youngest group (age, ≥20–35 years) as compared to FPG (ranged from 10.021 ± 0.052 to 10.190 ± 0.050 mmol/L) in patients with other age categories. The level of HbA1c was highest in the youngest group (8.809 ± 0.056%) and lowest in the oldest group (8.653 ± 0.082%). There was a significant correlation between FPG and HbA1c (<italic>R</italic> = 0.571, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). There were 484 patients below the diagnostic threshold (HbA1c &lt;6.5%), resulting in 3.78% false negative predictions. Majority of the false negative patients were in the age group of 40–75 years and had borderline FPG (7.0–8.0 mmol/L) and HbA1c (6.0–6.5%). These findings suggest that Saudi individuals with HbA1c between 6.0% and 6.5% may be considered as "probable diabetic" and their status should be verified by combined FPG and HbA1c criteria.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Endocrine research. Volume 39:Number 1(2014:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Endocrine research
- Issue:
- Volume 39:Number 1(2014:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 39, Issue 1 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 39
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0039-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 61
- Page End:
- 65
- Publication Date:
- 2014-02
- Subjects:
- Endocrinology, Experimental -- Periodicals
Endocrinology -- Periodicals
Endocrinology -- Periodicals
Research -- Periodicals
616.4 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/loi/erc ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3109/07435800.2013.828740 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0743-5800
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3740.469000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3351.xml