15 years of the Journal of Intellectual Capital and counting. Issue 1 (2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Is Part Of: Journal of intellectual capital. Volume 15:Issue 1(2014)
• Page Start: 2
• Page End: 37
• Publication Date: 2014
• Subjects: Intellectual capital -- Periodicals; Human capital -- Periodicals; Knowledge management -- Periodicals; 658.4038
• DOI: 10.1108/JIC-09-2013-0098
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1469-1930

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p> <bold>Purpose</bold> – The purpose of this paper is to review and critique the current status of intellectual capital (IC) research as published in the <italic>Journal of Intellectual Capital</italic> (<italic>JIC</italic>) as it heads into its 15th year with a view to understanding the past and possible direction of future IC research. <bold>Design/methodology/approach</bold> – Articles published in the <italic>JIC</italic> are reviewed building on prior IC research and analysis by Guthrie <italic>et al.</italic> (2012) and Dumay and Garanina (2013). To help understand the impact of articles in the <italic>JIC</italic> the analysis is supplemented by including citation data from google scholar, journal impact data from the SCImago Journal & Country Rank portal, and the 2013 Australian Business Dean's Council (ABDC) journal ranking list. Also included is commentary from the <italic>JIC</italic>'s senior editors based on their responses to questions asked via e‐mail relating to their involvement in, and the future of, the <italic>JIC</italic>. <bold>Findings</bold> – The <italic>JIC</italic> faces a challenge as it is most recognised as an accounting journal despite its focus on managing IC. The research published in the <italic>JIC</italic> is multidisciplinary as it comes from a wide range of perspectives. However, there appears to be a paucity of research emanating from different perspectives, most notably from North American academics, and a lack of focus on the private and public sectors. However, new perspectives of IC, especially that associated with IC praxis and the third stage of IC research are emerging as transformational opportunities for future IC research, along with the opportunity to experiment with transdisciplinary research. <bold>Originality/value</bold> – The paper presents a comprehensive critical review of the articles published in the <italic>JIC</italic> along with measuring the impact of the articles using citation data from google scholar. Using this approach, the type of research and its impacts can be simultaneously assessed to offer insights into future transformational IC research opportunities, and how IC researchers and the <italic>JIC</italic> can also be transformational.</p> <ack> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Acknowledgements</x> </title> <p>The author wants to thank the Editor, Rory Chase, for giving the opportunity to conduct research into the articles published in the <italic>JIC</italic> in honour of the 15th year of the journal's publication. The author also wants to thank the other senior editors, Nick Bontis (Assistant Editor), James Guthrie and Jay Chatzkel (Regional Editors) along with Rory Chase for their input into the history of, and their involvement in, the <italic>JIC</italic>. The author especially wants to thank James Guthrie for reviewing the drafts of the paper and his input as it helped the author to refine the insights, findings and conclusions. Last, but not least, the author is also grateful to Julz Stevens of Macquarie University for her editorial efforts, Jenny Hatton for her feedback on early drafts, and Fiona Crawford of Macquarie University for her sterling efforts to refine the paper's presentation.</p> <p></p> <p>Editors' Note: John Dumay has been a Member of the <italic>Journal of Intellectual Capital</italic> editorial board of advice since 2010 and is now the new Regional Editor for Australasia.</p> </ack> </abstract>