Design and industrial evaluation of a tool supporting semi‐automated website testing. (25th September 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mahmud, Jalal; Cypher, Allen; Haber, Eben; Lau, Tessa
• Is Part Of: Software testing, verification & reliability. Volume 24:Number 1(2014:Jan.)
• Page Start: 61
• Page End: 82
• Publication Date: 2012-09-25
• Subjects: Computer software -- Testing -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Verification -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Reliability -- Periodicals; 005.14
• DOI: 10.1002/stvr.1484
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-0833

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="stvr1484-abs-0001"> <title>SUMMARY</title> <p id="stvr1484-para-0001">Software testing is the most time‐intensive and resource‐intensive aspect of software development. Can support for testing be improved? This case study describes the motivations and design decisions behind the development of the testing tool, CoTester and its deployment to multiple development teams. CoTester outperforms available testing tools by representing tests using an easy‐to‐understand scripting language and thus making the tests easily editable. The design decisions of the testing tool were derived after conducting a series of interviews with testers and collecting their experiences with manual as well as automated testing. CoTester was developed to support these users, working in an environment of mixed manual and automatic tests, with a progression from manual to automatic testing when circumstances warrant. A series of deployments to four development teams showed that CoTester worked very well for <italic>non‐professional testers</italic> (i.e. those who do testing only part‐time), and it was also found to be useful by some professional testers. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p> </abstract>