The Decision to Exploit an R&D Project: Divergent Thinking across Middle and Senior Managers1. Issue 1 (7th October 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Behrens, Judith; Ernst, Holger; Shepherd, Dean A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of product innovation management. Volume 31:Issue 1(2014:Jan.)
• Page Start: 144
• Page End: 158
• Publication Date: 2013-10-07
• Subjects: New products -- Management -- Periodicals; 658.575
• DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12085
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0737-6782

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Research and development (R&amp;D) generates projects, but the question often remains: which projects should be exploited? Building on the innovation, strategy, and managerial cognition literatures, we use a conjoint field experiment to collect data on 4032 decisions made by 126 R&amp;D managers to test how project attributes, strategic context, and managers' characteristics influence innovation exploitation decisions. Using hierarchical linear modeling, we find that (1) experience impacts project exploitation decision policies of middle managers more than senior managers, (2) divergent thinking across middle and senior managers increases with experience, and (3) experienced middle managers diverge from experienced senior managers in their decisions to exploit opportunities by placing greater emphasis on strategic context (relative to competitors and fit within the portfolio) and lesser emphasis on uncertainty (technological and demand). These findings have implications for the strategy and innovation literature.</p> </abstract>