Reply to "Comments on 'Geomechanical and Geochemical Evidence of Piezonuclear Fission Reactions in the Earth's Crust' by A. Carpinteri and A. Manuello" by U. Bardi and G. Comoretto. (12th November 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Carpinteri, A.; Manuello, A.
• Is Part Of: Strain. Volume 49:Number 6(2013:Dec.)
• Page Start: 548
• Page End: 551
• Publication Date: 2013-11-12
• Subjects: Strains and stresses -- Measurement -- Periodicals; 624.176
• DOI: 10.1111/str.12071
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0039-2103

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <p>In the paper entitled "Comments on 'Geomechanical and Geochemical Evidence of Piezonuclear Fission Reactions in the Earth's Crust' by A. Carpinteri and Manuello" by U. Bardi and G. Comoretto, the authors criticise the hypothesis based on piezonuclear reactions for the interpretation of the compositional evolution of the Earth's crust. We report a detailed reply of how the traditional theories, used by the authors of the comments, are obviously inadequate to describe this new kind of nuclear phenomena. Only very recently, independent authors proposed a theoretical model explaining the anomalous energy emissions in the form of neutrons, involved in piezonuclear reactions, during fracture of nonradioactive rocks. It is also known how the evidences that Bardi and Comoretto claim to be non‐existent could be found in many independent works that appeared in most important journals about unexplained questions of the Earth's crust and environment. The data reported in the original work and the details included in this reply show that it is incorrect to consider impossible or simply to ignore the existence of unexplained phenomena only because they cannot be described by traditional models and conventional theories.</p> </abstract>