Preliminary investigation into subjective well-being, mental health, resilience, and spinal cord injury. (1st November 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Migliorini, Christine; Callaway, Libby; New, Peter
• Is Part Of: Journal of spinal cord medicine. Volume 36:Number 6(2013:Nov.)
• Page Start: 660
• Page End: 665
• Publication Date: 2013-11-01
• Subjects: Spinal cord -- Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals; Spinal cord -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.8305
• DOI: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000100
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1079-0268

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p> <bold>Objectives</bold> </p> <p>To undertake a pilot investigation into whether individuals whose subjective well-being had returned to the normal homeostatic range after a spinal cord injury (SCI) may be more resilient and therefore, at less risk of emotional distress over time. To consider the relative stability of subjective well-being in individuals with chronic SCI whose subjective well-being had previously returned to the normative homeostatic range.</p> <p> <bold>Study design</bold> </p> <p>Longitudinal study: Time 1 (T1) 2004 and Time 2 (T2) 2009.</p> <p> <bold>Setting</bold> </p> <p>Victoria, Australia.</p> <p> <bold>Participants</bold> </p> <p>Participants were adults living in the community with chronic SCI, who had no mental ill-health symptoms at T1.</p> <p> <bold>Outcome measures</bold> </p> <p>Scales include: Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale - Adult v5 (COMQoL-A5) at T1, Personal Well-being Index (PWI - the successor to the COMQol-A5) at T2, and Depression, Anxiety & Stress Scale - short form (DASS-21) at T1 and T2.</p> <p> <bold>Results</bold> </p> <p>Twenty-one adults participated at T1 and T2. Subjective well-being was stable for 57% of the cohort. However, 19% presented with symptoms of emotional distress by T2. There was no significant difference in age (<italic>P</italic> = 0.94) or time since injury (<italic>P</italic> = 0.51) between those reporting significant emotional symptoms and those without; nor was there any systematic change in health status.</p> <p> <bold>Conclusion</bold> </p> <p>This study yielded two important findings. First, individuals with chronic SCI may be vulnerable to mental health issues even after they have previously exhibited good resilience. Second, subjective well-being after SCI may not be as stable as suggested by the general quality of life literature that have examined genetic and personality connections to subjective well-being.</p> </abstract>