The effects of sacral nerve stimulation on continence are temporarily maintained after turning the stimulator off. (December 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Altomare, D. F.; Giannini, I.; Giuratrabocchetta, S.; Digennaro, R.
• Is Part Of: Colorectal disease. Volume 15:Number 12(2013)
• Page Start: e741
• Page End: e748
• Publication Date: 2013-12
• Subjects: Colon (Anatomy) -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Rectum -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.34
• DOI: 10.1111/codi.12418
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-8910

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="codi12418-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="codi12418-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>Sacral nerve stimulation is an effective treatment for urinary and faecal incontinence even though its mechanism of action is uncertain. Central nervous system involvement by 'setting‐up' neurological mechanisms appointed to control pelvic function has been hypothesized. The study aimed to evaluate whether the effects of long‐term sacral nerve stimulation are memorized and therefore maintained after switching off the stimulator.</p> </sec> <sec id="codi12418-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Method</title> <p>Patients having sacral nerve stimulation for faecal and/or urinary incontinence for at least 1 year had the stimulator turned off and the results monitored. Data recorded with the stimulator off were compared with post‐implant data. If symptoms recurred the stimulator was switched back on. Nineteen patients entered the study. Fourteen had faecal and/or urinary incontinence and five had faecal incontinence alone. The symptoms were assessed by means of a bowel function diary and dedicated questionnaire.</p> </sec> <sec id="codi12418-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>In 10 patients symptoms recurred at different intervals after a median off period of 3.4 months with a probability of symptom relapse of 55%. The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) score did not show any significant difference in nine patients with the stimulator off for at least 1 year. No factors predictive of symptom recurrence were identified although an idiopathic aetiology, severity of disease and urinary incontinence had higher hazard ratios. During the off period, none of the scores and episodes of incontinence showed significant changes compared with the on period.</p> </sec> <sec id="codi12418-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>The effects of sacral nerve stimulation on faecal and urinary incontinence were maintained in about half of patients after switching the stimulator off, but in some symptoms returned after different periods of time. The data shed new light on possible effects of sacral nerve stimulation on brain neuroplasticity in the control of continence.</p> </sec> </abstract>