Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment. (23rd August 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Leung, Brian; Roura‐Pascual, Nuria; Bacher, Sven; Heikkilä, Jaakko; Brotons, Lluis; Burgman, Mark A; Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina; Essl, Franz; Hulme, Philip E; Richardson, David M; Sol, Daniel; Vilà, Montserrat; Rejmanek, Marcel
• Is Part Of: Ecology letters. Volume 16:Number 11(2013:Nov.)
• Page Start: 1415
• Page End: e6
• Publication Date: 2013-08-23
• Subjects: Ecology -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/ele.12172
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1461-023X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ele12172-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice.</p> </abstract>