Important impacts of tissue selection and lipid extraction on ecological parameters derived from stable isotope ratios. Issue 10 (19th August 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Perkins, Matthew J.; McDonald, Robbie A.; van, F. J. Frank; Kelly, Simon D.; Rees, Gareth; Bearhop, Stuart; Freckleton, Robert
• Is Part Of: Methods in ecology and evolution. Volume 4:Issue 10(2013:Oct.)
• Page Start: 944
• Page End: 953
• Publication Date: 2013-08-19
• Subjects: Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12098
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2041-210X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="mee312098-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <p> <list id="mee312098-list-0001" list-type="order"> <list-item> <p>The nitrogen (δ<sup>15</sup>N) and carbon (δ<sup>13</sup>C) isotope ratios of animal tissues can help identify the composition of diets and open up a myriad of ecological applications. However, consumers do not ingest or assimilate all components of food items, and it is not well understood how sampling different tissues of sources and consumers may affect isotopic values ascribed, and thereby how such variation affects derived ecological measures.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Utilizing a simple prey–predator feeding relationship in insects, we examined isotopic differences in soft, exoskeleton and whole tissues using samples with and without lipid extraction. As a derived ecological measure, we calculated trophic discrimination factors, changes in δ<sup>15</sup>N or δ<sup>13</sup>C between source and consumer, for the different prey–predator tissue combinations.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Lipid extraction did not affect δ<sup>15</sup>N values, and we found significant tissue differences in δ<sup>15</sup>N that varied between prey and predator. Lipid extraction enriched δ<sup>13</sup>C values in most instances, and it was only after extraction of lipids that we observed consistent depletion of δ<sup>13</sup>C in exoskeleton relative to soft tissues in prey and predator.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Isotopic differences between tissue types propagated marked variation in derived ecological parameters. Common sampling practice using whole tissue for prey and predator (whole/whole) resulted in a trophic discrimination factor of 0·48‰ for δ<sup>15</sup>N, compared with correct factors of 0·97‰ (soft/whole) and 2·18‰ (soft/soft) using prey soft tissue actually ingested by the predator. For δ<sup>13</sup>C, variation across discrimination factors was less, with whole/whole tissue of −0·14‰, whilst correct factors were −0·55‰ (soft/whole) and −0·04‰ (soft/soft).</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Our results indicate that tissue selection and preparation are important considerations for isotopic studies using arthropods. Lipid extraction is necessary to derive accurate δ<sup>13</sup>C values based on proteins, whilst consequences of tissue selection are likely context‐dependent: In poorly defined systems where sources are isotopically similar or have larger variance, our results indicate that tissue selection within sources is important to avoid significant error, whether estimating trophic positions or dietary proportions using mixing models. In such cases, we strongly recommend exclusion of source materials not assimilated in consumers.</p> </list-item> </list> </p> </abstract>