Compliance and use of the World Health Organization checklist in UK operating theatres. Issue 12 (9th October 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Compliance and use of the World Health Organization checklist in UK operating theatres. Issue 12 (9th October 2013)
- Main Title:
- Compliance and use of the World Health Organization checklist in UK operating theatres
- Authors:
- Pickering, S. P.
Robertson, E. R.
Griffin, D.
Hadi, M.
Morgan, L. J.
Catchpole, K. C.
New, S.
Collins, G.
McCulloch, P. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjs9305-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="bjs9305-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p id="bjs9305-para-0001"> <bold>The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist is reported to reduce surgical morbidity and mortality, and is mandatory in the UK National Health Service. Hospital audit data show high compliance rates, but direct observation suggests that actual performance may be suboptimal</bold>.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9305-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p id="bjs9305-para-0002"> <bold>For each observed operation, WHO time‐out and sign‐out attempts were recorded, and the quality of the time‐out was evaluated using three measures: all information points communicated, all personnel present and active participation</bold>.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9305-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p id="bjs9305-para-0003"> <bold>Observation of WHO checklist performance was conducted for 294 operations, in five hospitals and four surgical specialties. Time‐out was attempted in 257 operations (87·4 per cent) and sign‐out in 26 (8·8 per cent). Within time‐out, all information was communicated in 141 (54·9 per cent), the whole team was present in 199 (77·4 per cent) and active participation was observed in 187 (72·8 per cent) operations. Surgical specialty did not affect time‐out or sign‐out attempt frequency (<italic>P</italic> = 0·453).<abstract abstract-type="main" id="bjs9305-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="bjs9305-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p id="bjs9305-para-0001"> <bold>The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist is reported to reduce surgical morbidity and mortality, and is mandatory in the UK National Health Service. Hospital audit data show high compliance rates, but direct observation suggests that actual performance may be suboptimal</bold>.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9305-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p id="bjs9305-para-0002"> <bold>For each observed operation, WHO time‐out and sign‐out attempts were recorded, and the quality of the time‐out was evaluated using three measures: all information points communicated, all personnel present and active participation</bold>.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9305-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p id="bjs9305-para-0003"> <bold>Observation of WHO checklist performance was conducted for 294 operations, in five hospitals and four surgical specialties. Time‐out was attempted in 257 operations (87·4 per cent) and sign‐out in 26 (8·8 per cent). Within time‐out, all information was communicated in 141 (54·9 per cent), the whole team was present in 199 (77·4 per cent) and active participation was observed in 187 (72·8 per cent) operations. Surgical specialty did not affect time‐out or sign‐out attempt frequency (<italic>P</italic> = 0·453). Time‐out attempt frequency (range 42–100 per cent) as well as all information communicated (15–83 per cent), all team present (35–90 per cent) and active participation (15–93 per cent) varied between hospitals (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0·001 for all)</bold>.</p> </sec> <sec id="bjs9305-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p id="bjs9305-para-0004"> <bold>Meaningful compliance with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist is much lower than indicated by administrative data. Sign‐out compliance is generally poor, suggesting incompatibility with normal theatre work practices. There is variation between hospitals, but consistency across studied specialties, suggesting a need to address organizational culture issues</bold>.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 100:Issue 12(2013:Dec.)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 100:Issue 12(2013:Dec.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 100, Issue 12 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 100
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0100-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1664
- Page End:
- 1670
- Publication Date:
- 2013-10-09
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.9305 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4205.xml