A randomized controlled trial of a self‐management psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners: a study protocol. (25th March 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A randomized controlled trial of a self‐management psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners: a study protocol. (25th March 2013)
- Main Title:
- A randomized controlled trial of a self‐management psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners: a study protocol
- Authors:
- McCaughan, Eilis
Prue, Gillian
McSorley, Oonagh
Northouse, Laurel
Schafenacker, Ann
Parahoo, Kader - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en" id="jan12132-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jan12132-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Little is known about interventions to help men and their partners cope with the after effects of prostate cancer treatment. The lack of in‐depth descriptions of the intervention content is hindering the identification of which intervention (or component of an intervention) works.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12132-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>To describe the development and evaluation of the content of a self‐management psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12132-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Design</title> <p>A feasibility randomized controlled trial including structure, process, and outcome analysis.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12132-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>This 9‐week intervention commences on completion of treatment and consists of three group and two telephone sessions. The intervention focuses on symptom management, sexual dysfunction, uncertainty management, positive thinking and couple communication. Forty‐eight couples will be assigned to either the intervention or a control group receiving usual care. Participants will be assessed at baseline, immediately postintervention and at 1 and 6 months postintervention. Outcome measures for patients and caregivers include self‐efficacy, quality of<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en" id="jan12132-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jan12132-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Little is known about interventions to help men and their partners cope with the after effects of prostate cancer treatment. The lack of in‐depth descriptions of the intervention content is hindering the identification of which intervention (or component of an intervention) works.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12132-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>To describe the development and evaluation of the content of a self‐management psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12132-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Design</title> <p>A feasibility randomized controlled trial including structure, process, and outcome analysis.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12132-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>This 9‐week intervention commences on completion of treatment and consists of three group and two telephone sessions. The intervention focuses on symptom management, sexual dysfunction, uncertainty management, positive thinking and couple communication. Forty‐eight couples will be assigned to either the intervention or a control group receiving usual care. Participants will be assessed at baseline, immediately postintervention and at 1 and 6 months postintervention. Outcome measures for patients and caregivers include self‐efficacy, quality of life, symptom distress, uncertainty, benefits of illness, health behaviour, and measures of couple communication and support. An additional caregiver assessment will be completed by the partner.</p> </sec> <sec id="jan12132-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Discussion</title> <p>The main purpose of this feasibility study is to investigate the acceptability of the CONNECT programme to men with prostate cancer and their partners and to gain feedback from the participants and facilitators to make changes to and enhance the programme. Reasons why men do not want to participate will be collated to enhance recruitment in the future. We will also test recruitment strategies, randomization procedures, and the acceptability of the questionnaires. Ethical approval granted December 2010.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of advanced nursing. Volume 69:Number 11(2013:Nov.)
- Journal:
- Journal of advanced nursing
- Issue:
- Volume 69:Number 11(2013:Nov.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 69, Issue 11 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 69
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0069-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 2572
- Page End:
- 2583
- Publication Date:
- 2013-03-25
- Subjects:
- Nursing -- Periodicals
610.7305 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2648 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jan.12132 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0309-2402
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4918.947000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3062.xml