Feeding ability of a fluvial habitat‐specialist and habitat‐generalist fish in turbulent and still conditions. Issue 4 (22nd May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vanderpham, Jeffrey P.; Nakagawa, Shinichi; Closs, Gerard P.
• Is Part Of: Ecology of freshwater fish. Volume 22:Issue 4(2013:Oct.)
• Page Start: 596
• Page End: 606
• Publication Date: 2013-05-22
• Subjects: Freshwater fishes -- Periodicals; Freshwater fishes -- Ecology -- Periodicals; Fisheries -- Periodicals; 597.092
• DOI: 10.1111/eff.12064
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0906-6691

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en" id="eff12064-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Species termed 'habitat‐generalists' are able to survive across a wide range of habitats, potentially enabled by the plastic behaviours and morphologies of individuals. This study aimed to compare habitat‐related adaptive specialisation in habitat‐generalists and specialists, by comparing feeding abilities of fish under varied hydrodynamic conditions. We compared the proportion of prey consumed by a New Zealand fluvial habitat‐specialist, the redfin bully, to a closely related habitat‐generalist found in fluvial and lacustrine habitats, the common bully, over a 6‐h period in either still or turbulent aquaria. We tested for intraspecific habitat‐specific adaptations by comparing feeding of common bullies from habitats with different hydrodynamic conditions. Within common bullies, previous research has documented a pattern of more lateral‐line system oculoscapular canal pores in fluvial habitats compared to lacustrine ones. By testing for a relationship between total pores and feeding success, we also aimed to identify the adaptive value of an increase in pores in turbulence. We identified decreased feeding (i.e., proportion of prey consumed) by both species in turbulence, but less so for redfin bullies. There was no clear indication of adaptation to habitat type by common bullies, with high variability in feeding by fish from all locations. We also found no statistical relationship between feeding and total oculoscapular canal pores. The results of this study suggest specialised adaptations of a habitat‐specialist to turbulent environments. The variability in feeding activity of common bullies also suggests the importance of behavioural plasticity in the survival of a habitat‐generalist across a wide range of conditions.</p> </abstract>