Neonatal outcome after trial of labor or elective cesarean section in relation to the indication for the previous cesarean delivery. (30th July 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Neonatal outcome after trial of labor or elective cesarean section in relation to the indication for the previous cesarean delivery. (30th July 2013)
- Main Title:
- Neonatal outcome after trial of labor or elective cesarean section in relation to the indication for the previous cesarean delivery
- Authors:
- Fagerberg, Marie C.
Marsal, Karel
Källen, Karin - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="aogs12202-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To compare the neonatal outcome after a trial of labor (TOL) with that after an elective cesarean section (CS) following one previous cesarean delivery, considering the indication for the first CS.</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Design</title> <p>Population‐based cohort study.</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Setting</title> <p>Sweden.</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Population</title> <p>Women with their first two deliveries between 1992 and 2007 registered in the Swedish Medical Birth Registry.</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>The risk of low Apgar score (&lt;7 at 5 min) after a TOL was compared with that after an elective CS among 407 159 singletons of women with one previous vaginal delivery and 59 643 singletons of women with one previous CS. The indication for the first‐delivery CS was estimated using a hierarchical system. For each indication group, the odds ratio and 95% CI for low Apgar score, TOL vs. elective CS, was computed.</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>Main outcome measure</title> <p>Low Apgar score.</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0007" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The overall risk of low Apgar<abstract abstract-type="main" id="aogs12202-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To compare the neonatal outcome after a trial of labor (TOL) with that after an elective cesarean section (CS) following one previous cesarean delivery, considering the indication for the first CS.</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Design</title> <p>Population‐based cohort study.</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Setting</title> <p>Sweden.</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Population</title> <p>Women with their first two deliveries between 1992 and 2007 registered in the Swedish Medical Birth Registry.</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>The risk of low Apgar score (&lt;7 at 5 min) after a TOL was compared with that after an elective CS among 407 159 singletons of women with one previous vaginal delivery and 59 643 singletons of women with one previous CS. The indication for the first‐delivery CS was estimated using a hierarchical system. For each indication group, the odds ratio and 95% CI for low Apgar score, TOL vs. elective CS, was computed.</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>Main outcome measure</title> <p>Low Apgar score.</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0007" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The overall risk of low Apgar score was increased in the TOL group (adjusted odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.5–2.1), but the estimate differed substantially by the indication for the first CS (<italic>p</italic>‐value for homogeneity = 0.0001). There was a high risk for low Apgar score after TOL and first CS indication "complications during labor/delivery" (adjusted odds ratio 2.4, 95% CI 1.7–3.4), but low risk with TOL and first CS "without medical indication" (adjusted odds ratio 0.7, 95% CI 0.2–2.1).</p> </sec> <sec id="aogs12202-sec-0008" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Neonatal outcome might be improved by considering the indication for the first CS when choosing between an elective CS or a TOL for the second delivery.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Volume 92:Number 10(2013)
- Journal:
- Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
- Issue:
- Volume 92:Number 10(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 92, Issue 10 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 92
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0092-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 1151
- Page End:
- 1158
- Publication Date:
- 2013-07-30
- Subjects:
- Gynecology -- Periodicals
Pregnancy -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
618.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/loi/obs ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00016349.asp ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/aogs.12202 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0001-6349
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0641.600000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3205.xml