An In Vitro evaluation of disinfection protocols used for needleless connectors of central venous catheters. (7th June 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mazher, M.A.; Kallen, A.; Edwards, J.R.; Donlan, R.M.
• Is Part Of: Letters in applied microbiology. Volume 57:Number 4(2013:Oct.)
• Page Start: 282
• Page End: 287
• Publication Date: 2013-06-07
• Subjects: Microbiology -- Periodicals; 660.62
• DOI: 10.1111/lam.12108
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0266-8254

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="lam12108-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="lam12108-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>A repeatable and sensitive method to evaluate the effect of three antiseptics and two disinfection techniques on viable micro‐organisms on luer‐activated catheter needleless connectors (NCs) was developed. NCs were inoculated with <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> or <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> and disinfected with 3·15% chlorhexidine gluconate + 70% isopropanol (CGI), 70% isopropanol (IPA) or 10% PVP povidone‐iodine (PI) antiseptic pads using: (i) scrubbing the NC septum and threaded external surfaces or (ii) wiping only the surface of the septum. Treatments were also evaluated against NCs pretreated with human serum and exposed for 18 h to <italic>Staph. epidermidis</italic> prior to testing. Viable cells were quantified by plate count. The method for inoculation and recovery of luminal micro‐organisms was repeatable (SD, 0·31; <italic>n</italic> = 28). IPA disinfection provided an approximate 3 log<sub>10</sub> CFU reduction; CGI and PI provided 3–4 log<sub>10</sub> reductions. PI and CGI were more effective than IPA (<italic>P</italic> < 0·05), but differences between CGI and PI were not significant for either disinfection method. IPA, but not CGI and PI was also less effective (<italic>P</italic> < 0·05) against NCs inoculated with <italic>Kl. pneumoniae</italic> than <italic>Staph. epidermidis</italic>. Pretreatment with serum and prolonged <italic>Staph. epidermidis</italic> inoculation removed the advantage seen with CGI and PI; log<sub>10</sub> reductions were 1·80, 1·73 and 2·50 for CGI, PI and IPA, respectively. PI or CGI may be more effective than IPA for NC disinfection but effectiveness may be reduced on NCs contaminated with blood or serum.</p> </sec> <sec id="lam12108-abs-1001" sec-type="section"> <title>Significance and Impact of the Study</title> <p>sensitive and repeatable protocol was developed to evaluate antiseptics for disinfecting catheter needleless connectors (NCs). Povidone‐iodine (PI) and chlorhexidine gluconate plus isopropanol (CGI) were more effective than isopropanol (IPA) for reducing <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> contamination of NCs. The effectiveness of PI and CGI was reduced on NCs pre‐exposed to human serum and prolonged bacterial inoculation. IPA was also less effective against NCs contaminated with <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic>.</p> </sec> </abstract>