Reducing uncertainty in the climatic interpretations of speleothem δ18O. Issue 10 (21st May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jex, C. N.; Phipps, S. J.; Baker, A.; Bradley, C.
• Is Part Of: Geophysical research letters. Volume 40:Issue 10(2013:May)
• Page Start: 2259
• Page End: 2264
• Publication Date: 2013-05-21
• Subjects: Geophysics -- Periodicals; Planets -- Periodicals; Lunar geology -- Periodicals; 550
• DOI: 10.1002/grl.50467
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-8276

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>[1] We explore two principal areas of uncertainty associated with paleoclimate reconstructions from speleothem δ¹⁸O (δ¹⁸O_spel): potential non‐stationarity in relationships between local climate and larger‐scale atmospheric circulation, and routing of water through the karst aquifer. Using a δ¹⁸O_spel record from Turkey, the CSIRO Mk3L climate system model and the KarstFOR karst hydrology model, we confirm the stationarity of relationships between cool season precipitation and regional circulation dynamics associated with the North Sea‐Caspian pattern since 1 ka. Stalagmite δ¹⁸O is predicted for the last 500 years, using precipitation and temperature output from the CSIRO Mk3L model and synthetic δ¹⁸O of precipitation as inputs for the KarstFOR model. Interannual variability in the δ¹⁸O_spel record is captured by KarstFOR, but we cannot reproduce the isotopically lighter conditions of the sixteenth to seventeenth centuries. We argue that forward models of paleoclimate proxies (such as KarstFOR) embedded within isotope‐enabled general circulation models are now required.</p> </abstract>