Ocular motor score a novel clinical approach to evaluating ocular motor function in children. (6th June 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Olsson, Monica; Fahnehjelm, Kristina Teär; Rydberg, Agneta; Ygge, Jan
• Is Part Of: Acta ophthalmologica. Volume 91:Number 6(2013)
• Page Start: 564
• Page End: 570
• Publication Date: 2012-06-06
• Subjects: Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; 617.7005
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02468.x
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1755-375X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract.</title> <p> <bold>Purpose: </bold> Ocular motility disturbances are common in a number of neuropaediatric and neurometabolic disorders. Assessment of ocular motor function can be a source of information for diagnosis and follow‐up of these patients.</p> <p> <bold>Aim: </bold> To evaluate a new clinical ocular motor function test: ocular motor score (OMS) and provide reference values in children and young adults without known ocular or neurological disorders.</p> <p> <bold>Material and Methods: </bold> A total of 233 children and young adults, 103 males and 130 females between the ages of 6 months and 19 years, were assessed according to a specific OMS protocol. They were divided into four different age groups: 0.5–3, 4–6, 7–10 and 11–19 years. The OMS protocol consists of 15 different subtests evaluating ocular motor function, and a total score of minimum 0 up to max 15 can be obtained: the minimum score, 0, is considered normal while 1 represents an abnormal function.</p> <p> <bold>Results: </bold> The median OMS in the whole reference group was 0.3 (range 0–4.8). The median OMS in the different age groups, starting with the youngest, was: 0.9 (range 0.3–4.8), 0.3 (range 0–3.4), 0.3 (range 0–2.3) and 0 (range 0–3.5), respectively. The youngest subjects, aged 0.5–3, showed a significantly higher total OMS compared with the other age groups (p < 0.001).</p> <p> <bold>Conclusion: </bold> This study provides reference values for the OMS test in a population aged 0.5–19 years. The test may be valuable as a screening tool for identification and follow‐up of ocular motor dysfunction in children and young adults.</p> </abstract>