Exhaled nitric oxide indicates poorly athlete's asthma. (7th April 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Voutilainen, Mikko; Malmberg, Leo Pekka; Vasankari, Tommi; Haahtela, Tari
• Is Part Of: Clinical respiratory journal. Volume 7:Number 4(2013)
• Page Start: 347
• Page End: 353
• Publication Date: 2013-04-07
• Subjects: Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Respiratory organs -- Periodicals; 616.24
• DOI: 10.1111/crj.12014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1752-6981

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="crj12014-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Introduction</title> <p>In athletes, exercise‐induced respiratory symptoms are common and their assessment is time and resource consuming.</p> </sec> <sec id="crj12014-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>The objective was to evaluate fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) as a predictor of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and of asthma.</p> </sec> <sec id="crj12014-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and Methods</title> <p>Eighty‐seven elite athletes and a control group of 87 sedentary patients with symptoms suggesting asthma underwent measurements of FENO and of BHR by using methacholine provocation test (MCH) and eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea (EVH) (athletes) or histamine provocation test (HIST) (controls).</p> </sec> <sec id="crj12014-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>In athletes, elevated FENO (>30 ppb) was not associated with lung function‐confirmed asthma or with MCH positivity, but receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis showed some predictive value for EVH positivity [Area Under Curve (AUC) 0.652, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53 to 0.78, <italic>P</italic> = 0.020]. However, the sensitivity (55%) and the specificity (71%) were poor. In sedentary patients, FENO was significantly associated with both confirmed asthma and HIST positivity, ROC analysis showing FENO to be significantly predictive for HIST positivity (AUC 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.96, <italic>P</italic> = 0.001) and for asthma (AUC 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.85, <italic>P</italic> < 0.001).</p> </sec> <sec id="crj12014-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>The results suggest that in contrast to sedentary patients, FENO seems to be a poor predictor of BHR and of clinical asthma in elite athletes. We find it unlikely that FENO could be a useful screening tool in athletes with exercise‐induced respiratory symptoms.</p> </sec> </abstract>