Non‐invasive prenatal testing with cell‐free DNA: US physician attitudes toward implementation in clinical practice. (22nd March 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Non‐invasive prenatal testing with cell‐free DNA: US physician attitudes toward implementation in clinical practice. (22nd March 2013)
- Main Title:
- Non‐invasive prenatal testing with cell‐free DNA: US physician attitudes toward implementation in clinical practice
- Authors:
- Musci, Thomas J.
Fairbrother, Genevieve
Batey, Annette
Bruursema, Jennifer
Struble, Craig
Song, Ken - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec id="pd4091-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>The aim of this study was to assess awareness, potential adoption, and current utilization of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) analysis for common fetal aneuploidies among obstetricians.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4091-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A 36‐item web‐based survey was designed to assess the current practice of fetal aneuploidy screening and knowledge and utilization of NIPT for fetal trisomy. Practicing obstetricians in the United States were invited via email to participate in the survey.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4091-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Of the 101 obstetricians that completed the survey (27% academic‐based, 73% private practice), 97% offer screening to high‐risk patients and 91% offer screening to average‐risk patients. With regard to current screening tests, the top three advantages were as follows: recommendation by professional societies, no risk to the pregnancy, and long history/experience with the test, whereas the top three limitations were as follows: patient anxiety, risks of follow‐up invasive testing, and high false positives. NIPT had been used by 32% of respondents and 22% were familiar with NIPT and the associated clinical data. The majority of physicians predicted that they would offer NIPT to high‐risk women (86.1%) and average‐risk women (76.2%) within<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec id="pd4091-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>The aim of this study was to assess awareness, potential adoption, and current utilization of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) analysis for common fetal aneuploidies among obstetricians.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4091-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A 36‐item web‐based survey was designed to assess the current practice of fetal aneuploidy screening and knowledge and utilization of NIPT for fetal trisomy. Practicing obstetricians in the United States were invited via email to participate in the survey.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4091-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Of the 101 obstetricians that completed the survey (27% academic‐based, 73% private practice), 97% offer screening to high‐risk patients and 91% offer screening to average‐risk patients. With regard to current screening tests, the top three advantages were as follows: recommendation by professional societies, no risk to the pregnancy, and long history/experience with the test, whereas the top three limitations were as follows: patient anxiety, risks of follow‐up invasive testing, and high false positives. NIPT had been used by 32% of respondents and 22% were familiar with NIPT and the associated clinical data. The majority of physicians predicted that they would offer NIPT to high‐risk women (86.1%) and average‐risk women (76.2%) within 12 months.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4091-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Obstetricians plan to increase their utilization of NIPT and expect that the majority of both high‐risk and average‐risk patients will be offered NIPT as an option. © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Prenatal diagnosis. Volume 33:Number 5(2013:May)
- Journal:
- Prenatal diagnosis
- Issue:
- Volume 33:Number 5(2013:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 5 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0033-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 424
- Page End:
- 428
- Publication Date:
- 2013-03-22
- Subjects:
- Prenatal diagnosis -- Periodicals
Fetus -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.32075 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/pd.4091 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0197-3851
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6607.646000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3951.xml