Comparison of therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen between LDX and commonly prescribed long-acting stimulants for the treatment of ADHD in youth and adults. (October 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen between LDX and commonly prescribed long-acting stimulants for the treatment of ADHD in youth and adults. (October 2013)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen between LDX and commonly prescribed long-acting stimulants for the treatment of ADHD in youth and adults
- Authors:
- Setyawan, Juliana
Hodgkins, Paul
Guérin, Annie
Gauthier, Geneviève
Cloutier, Martin
Wu, Eric
Erder, M. Haim - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="ss1"> <title>Objective:</title> <p>To compare therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) patients initiated on lisdexamfetamine (LDX) vs other once-daily Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved stimulants.</p> </sec> <sec id="ss2"> <title>Methods:</title> <p>ADHD patients initiated on a long-acting ADHD stimulant medication (index medication) in/after 2007 were selected from a large US administrative claims database. Patients were required to be persistent for ≥90 days and continuously enrolled in their healthcare plan for ≥12 months following treatment initiation date. Based on age and previous treatment status, patients were classified into treatment-naïve children and adolescents (6–17 years old), previously treated children and adolescents, treatment-naïve adults (≥18 years old), and previously treated adults. Furthermore, patients were classified into four mutually exclusive treatment groups, based on index medication: lisdexamfetamine (LDX), osmotic release methylphenidate hydrochloride long-acting (OROS MPH), other methylphenidate/dexmethylphenidate long-acting (MPH LA), and amphetamine/dextroamphetamine long-acting (AMPH LA). The average daily consumption was measured as the quantity of index medication supplied in the 12-month study period divided by the total number of days of supply. Therapy augmentation was defined as the<abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="ss1"> <title>Objective:</title> <p>To compare therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) patients initiated on lisdexamfetamine (LDX) vs other once-daily Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved stimulants.</p> </sec> <sec id="ss2"> <title>Methods:</title> <p>ADHD patients initiated on a long-acting ADHD stimulant medication (index medication) in/after 2007 were selected from a large US administrative claims database. Patients were required to be persistent for ≥90 days and continuously enrolled in their healthcare plan for ≥12 months following treatment initiation date. Based on age and previous treatment status, patients were classified into treatment-naïve children and adolescents (6–17 years old), previously treated children and adolescents, treatment-naïve adults (≥18 years old), and previously treated adults. Furthermore, patients were classified into four mutually exclusive treatment groups, based on index medication: lisdexamfetamine (LDX), osmotic release methylphenidate hydrochloride long-acting (OROS MPH), other methylphenidate/dexmethylphenidate long-acting (MPH LA), and amphetamine/dextroamphetamine long-acting (AMPH LA). The average daily consumption was measured as the quantity of index medication supplied in the 12-month study period divided by the total number of days of supply. Therapy augmentation was defined as the use of another ADHD medication concomitantly with the index medication for ≥28 consecutive days. Therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen were compared between treatment groups using multivariate logistic regression models.</p> </sec> <sec id="ss3"> <title>Results:</title> <p>Compared to the other treatment groups, LDX patients were less likely to augment with another ADHD medication (range odds ratios [OR]; 1.28–3.30) and to deviate from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen (range OR; 1.73–4.55), except for previously treated adult patients, where therapy augmentation differences were not statistically significant when compared to OROS MPH and MPH LA patients.</p> </sec> <sec id="ss4"> <title>Limitation:</title> <p>This study did not control for ADHD severity.</p> </sec> <sec id="ss5"> <title>Conclusion:</title> <p>Overall, compared to LDX-treated patients, patients initiated on other ADHD medications were equally or more likely to have a therapy augmentation and more likely to deviate from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of medical economics. Volume 16:Number 10(2013)
- Journal:
- Journal of medical economics
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Number 10(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 10 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0016-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 1203
- Page End:
- 1215
- Publication Date:
- 2013-10
- Subjects:
- Medical care -- Cost control -- Periodicals
Medical economics -- Periodicals
362.10941 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/jme ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3111/13696998.2013.832258 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1369-6998
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5017.049500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3017.xml