Catheter-related bloodstream infections: a prospective observational study of central venous and arterial catheters. (October 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wittekamp, Bastiaan H.; Chalabi, Myriam; van Mook, Walther N. K. A.; Winkens, Bjorn; Verbon, Annelies; Bergmans, Dennis C. J. J.
• Is Part Of: Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Volume 45:Number 10(2013:Oct.)
• Page Start: 738
• Page End: 745
• Publication Date: 2013-10
• Subjects: Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; Infection -- Periodicals; 616.9
• DOI: 10.3109/00365548.2013.804632
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0036-5548

Abstract

<abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <italic>Background:</italic> Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) can lead to increased morbidity and length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU). The purpose of this study was to analyse the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection associated with central venous catheters (CVCs) and arterial catheters (ACs) and to identify risk factors for CRBSIs in our ICU. <italic>Methods:</italic> This was a prospective observational study in a 17-bed medical–surgical ICU of a 715-bed university hospital. Patients admitted to the ICU for ≥ 24 h between 1 September 2007 and 30 April 2008, who received a CVC or AC, were included in the study. <italic>Results:</italic> A total of 219 patients with 258 CVCs and 336 ACs were included in the study and observed for a combined total of 3172 catheter-days. The CRBSI incidence density was 1.2 per 1000 catheter-days for CVCs and 2.1 per 1000 catheter-days for ACs. The mean LOS (<italic>p</italic> = 0.003), the number of days a catheter remained in situ (<italic>p</italic> = 0.001), and the length of pre-ICU in-hospital stay (<italic>p</italic> = 0.031) were significantly higher in the CRBSI group. Risk factor analysis was not reliable due to the low number of CRBSIs. <italic>Conclusion:</italic> The incidence of AC- and CVC-related CRBSIs was comparable to the incidence reported in the literature. However, the incidence for ACs was higher than for CVCs. In addition to CVCs, ACs should be considered a possible cause of catheter-related infections and both should be replaced when CRBSI is suspected.</p> </abstract>