Rare or elusive? A test of expert knowledge about rarity of Amazon forest birds. Issue 7 (17th January 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cerqueira, Marconi C.; Cohn‐Haft, Mario; Vargas, Claudeir F.; Nader, Carlos E.; Andretti, Christian B.; Costa, Thiago V. V.; Sberze, Monica; Hines, James E.; Ferraz, Gonçalo; Burgman, Mark
• Is Part Of: Diversity & distributions. Volume 19:Issue 7(2013)
• Page Start: 710
• Page End: 721
• Publication Date: 2013-01-17
• Subjects: Biodiversity -- Periodicals; Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12033
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1366-9516

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ddi12033-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="ddi12033-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>To offer a test of expert knowledge about rarity of twenty Amazon forest bird species following an approach that equates rarity with low site occupancy and formally accounts for imperfect species detection. We define ten pairs of closely related species, each pair with one hypothetically common and one hypothetically rare species. Our null hypothesis is that members of each pair have similar occupancy, with hypothesized differences due to detection errors alone.</p> </sec> <sec id="ddi12033-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Location</title> <p>A 1000‐ha plot of primary rainforest in the central Brazilian Amazon.</p> </sec> <sec id="ddi12033-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We visited each of 55 sampling sites multiple times per season for three field seasons and estimated the probability of site occupancy by each species following a maximum likelihood state‐space approach that also estimates the probability that a species is present yet undetected at a site. To maximize detection and account for its variation, we employed three different sampling techniques while systematically training and testing observer's ability to recognize species.</p> </sec> <sec id="ddi12033-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Occupancy estimates agree with expert predictions in all but two species pairs and show no evidence of clear temporal variation in occupancy between sampling seasons. Detection probability had a positive relation with observer ability, a strong relation to time of day across species, and a strong relation with the use of playback for some species. Detection with point counts and with autonomous recorders varied between species pairs.</p> </sec> <sec id="ddi12033-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Main conclusions</title> <p>We reject the null hypothesis of equal occupancy within pairs, concluding that expert knowledge on species rarity is useful and worth eliciting. Our results replace qualitative ratings of rarity with statistical estimates of occupancy, establishing a reliable baseline for future comparisons. Besides illustrating the relevance of expert knowledge, this application to Amazonian birds illustrates a flexible approach that can be used for testing knowledge about rarity for a variety of species groups and spatial scales.</p> </sec> </abstract>