A hinting strategy for online learning of radiograph interpretation by medical students. Issue 9 (11th August 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boutis, Kathy; Pecaric, Martin; Shiau, Maria; Ridley, Jane; P Gladding, Sophie; S Andrews, John; V Pusic, Martin
• Is Part Of: Medical education. Volume 47:Issue 9(2013)
• Page Start: 877
• Page End: 887
• Publication Date: 2013-08-11
• Subjects: Medical education -- Periodicals; Medical education -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 610.7
• DOI: 10.1111/medu.12182
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0308-0110

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="medu12182-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="medu12182-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Context</title> <p>We examined whether a 'hint' manoeuvre increases the time novice medical learners spend on reviewing a radiograph, thereby potentially increasing their interpretation accuracy.</p> </sec> <sec id="medu12182-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Senior year medical students were recruited into a randomised control, three‐arm, multicentre trial. Students reviewed an online 50‐case learning set that varied in degree of 'hint' intervention. The 'hint' was a dialogue box that appeared after a student submitted an answer, encouraging the student to re‐evaluate their interpretation. The students in the control group received no hints. In the weak intervention group, students received 'hints' with 66% of their incorrect interpretations and 33% of those that were correct. In the strong intervention group, the incorrect interpretation hint frequency was 80%, whereas for correct responses it was 20%. All students completed a 20‐case post‐test immediately and 2 weeks after the 50 cases. The primary outcome was student performance on the immediate post‐test, measured as the ability to discriminate between normal and abnormal films (dPrime). Secondary outcomes included the probability of considering the hint, time spent on learning cases and knowledge retention at 2 weeks.</p> </sec> <sec id="medu12182-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>We enrolled 117 medical students from three sites into the three study groups: control (36), weak intervention (40) and strong intervention (41) groups. The mean (standard deviation) dPrime in the control, weak and strong groups were 0.4 (1.1), 0.7 (1.1) and 0.4 (0.9), respectively (<italic>P</italic> = 0.4). In the weak and strong groups, participants reconsidered answers in 556 of 1944 (28.6%) hinting opportunities, and those who reconsidered their answers spent a mean (95% confidence interval) of 13.9 (11.9, 16.0) seconds longer on each case. There were no significant differences in knowledge retention at 2 weeks between the groups (<italic>P</italic> = 0.2).</p> </sec> <sec id="medu12182-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Although the implemented hinting strategy did result in students spending more time considering a proportion of the cases, overall it was not effective in improving student performance.</p> </sec> </abstract>