Micro‐elevations in paddy fields affect the efficacy of mechanical weeding: Evaluation of weeding machines to control Monochoria vaginalis in herbicide‐free farming. Issue 2 (4th June 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shoji, Koichi; Itoh, Kazuyuki; Kawahara, Fukiko; Yoshida, Yuumi; Yamamoto, Yoshihisa; Sudo, Ken‐Ichi
• Is Part Of: Weed biology and management. Volume 13:Issue 2(2013)
• Page Start: 45
• Page End: 52
• Publication Date: 2013-06-04
• Subjects: Weeds -- Periodicals; Weeds -- Control -- Periodicals; 632.5
• DOI: 10.1111/wbm.12011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1444-6162

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Differences in local topography (micro‐elevation) within a paddy field that constitute a source of variability in agronomical indicators have not been considered thoroughly as a block factor in weed studies. This study investigated and evaluated the performance of weeding machines (weeders) in two herbicide‐free paddy fields that contained micro‐elevations. The plant density of <italic>Monochoria vaginalis</italic>, a typical and harmful paddy weed unless controlled with herbicides, was used as the indicator of the efficacy of the weeders. Among the three weeders that were tested, one suppressed <italic>M. vaginalis</italic> dramatically at low elevations and the others were less sensitive to micro‐elevation. For comparison across the fields, micro‐elevations at weed sampling locations were converted to the initial depth of water by using the records of hydrographs that had been set in each field. The relationship between the initial depth of water and the plant density of <italic>M. vaginalis</italic> was very clear with the use of the elevation‐sensitive weeder. Moreover, this relationship was valid, even with the less‐sensitive weeders. The finding that the greater the depth of water, the less the plant density was significant, even for <italic>M. vaginalis</italic>, a difficult aquatic paddy weed that was controlled with any of the weeders tested. Thus, micro‐elevation within a paddy field needs to be treated as a crucial block factor in weed‐sampling studies. A coarse survey of the level of a field and the installation of a hydrograph are recommended for a clear analysis of the background of weed control practices.</p> </abstract>