Effect of osteoblast cell culture on the bone implant contact. (May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hoşgör, F.; Yilmaz, N.; Şenyurt, Ö.; Gümüşova, S.; Çam, B.; Ceylan, G.; Yardimci, C.; Pinarli, F. Alparslan
• Is Part Of: Acta odontologica Scandinavica. Volume 71:Number 3/4(2013)
• Page Start: 626
• Page End: 631
• Publication Date: 2013-05
• Subjects: Dentistry -- Periodicals; 617.6005
• DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2012.700066
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0001-6357

Abstract

<abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <bold> <italic>Purpose.</italic> </bold> The aim of this study is to acquire an ideal bone implant contact under the cover of osteogenic effect of osteoblasts derived from Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs). <bold><italic>Materials and methods.</italic></bold> Thirty dental implants were used for this study. Implants were placed in sheep mandibles and defects were created 4 mm coronally in the dental implants. These defects were filled with Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in one group and with PRP + Osteoblast Cell Culture (OCC) in another group. No procedure was conducted on the control group defects (empty defect group). Eight weeks later, osseointegration was investigated with Bone Implant Contact (BIC) measurements histomorphologically. Data were checked statistically. <bold><italic>Results.</italic></bold> The variation of BIC rates between Empty Defect Group and PRP groups was significant (<italic>p</italic> <0.05). The BIC rate of the PRP group was higher than that of the Empty Defect Group. The variation of BIC rates between Empty Defect Group and PRP + OCC groups was significant (<italic>p</italic> <0.05). The BIC rate of the PRP + OCC group was higher than that of the Empty Defect Group. The variation of BIC rates between PRP and PRP + MSC groups was significant (<italic>p</italic><0.05). The BIC rate of the PRP + OCC group was higher than that of the PRP group. At the end of the 8-week healing period, it was observed that the percentage of BIC was highest in the PRP + OCC group. <bold><italic>Conclusions.</italic></bold> Implant–bone connection was better in the OCC−PRP group compared with the PRP group and the empty defect group. The use of OCC-PRP combination was effective on healing. The BIC value was increased significantly by OCC.</p> </abstract>