Accuracy of Two Stereolithographic Surgical Templates: A Retrospective Study. (11th July 2011)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cassetta, Michele; Giansanti, Matteo; Di Mambro, Alfonso; Calasso, Sabrina; Barbato, Ersilia
• Is Part Of: Clinical implant dentistry and related research. Volume 15:Number 3(2013:Jun.)
• Page Start: 448
• Page End: 459
• Publication Date: 2011-07-11
• Subjects: Dental implants -- Periodicals; Dental Implantation -- Periodicals; Dental Implants -- Periodicals; 617.693
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00369.x
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1523-0899

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <p> <bold>Background:</bold> The use of computer software and stereolithography for dental implant therapy has significantly increased during the last few years. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the mean accuracy and maximum deviations values of dental implant placement using two stereolithographic (SLA) guide systems.</p> <p> <bold>Materials and Methods:</bold> Twenty patients were selected and 227 implants were inserted using bone‐, tooth‐ and mucosa‐supported SLA surgical guides. Thirty‐one guides, both single‐ and multiple‐type, were used. Some of the single‐type surgical guides were fixed with osteosynthesis screws. A postoperative computer tomography (CT) was performed and an iterative closest point algorithm was used to match the jaw of the CT preoperative with the jaw of the postoperative CT. Quantitative data of each group were described. The <italic>t</italic>‐test was used to determine the influence of the utilization of the different types of SLA on accuracy values.</p> <p> <bold>Results:</bold> <italic>t</italic>‐Test demonstrated a better accuracy of the multiple‐type guides in almost all deviation values when the mucosa‐supported guides were considered. Regarding the bone‐supported template, the single‐type fixed group showed a better accuracy while the highest values of deviation were registered by the multiple‐type guides. The single‐type group showed a better accuracy when the tooth support was considered.</p> <p> <bold>Conclusions:</bold> The results of the present study indicated best accuracy of the single‐type guide using a bone or tooth support. The multiple‐type guide recorded the best accuracy data when the mucosa support was considered comparing either a fixed and a not‐fixed single‐type guide.</p> </abstract>