Obstetric outcome of ethnic Turkish women in London: A retrospective case–control study. (May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kanthasamy, M.; Bognanno, A.; Subramanian, V.; Macneilly, L.; Miguel, L.; Dong, S.; Taiwo, E.; Nauta, M.; Yoong, W.
• Is Part Of: Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. Volume 33:Number 4(2013)
• Page Start: 367
• Page End: 369
• Publication Date: 2013-05
• Subjects: Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Gynecology -- Periodicals; 618.05
• DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2013.773295
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0144-3615

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>There is concern that the maternal mortality in ethnic minority women is significantly greater than that of Caucasian British women. The objective of this study was to compare the demographic and obstetric outcomes between these two groups. Data were collected retrospectively over a 2-year period from 148 index and 148 control cases. The study group had statistically similar maternal age, labour duration, blood loss and mode of delivery compared with Caucasian British women (<italic>p &gt; </italic>0.05). A total of 68% of Turkish women spoke little or no English; were more likely to be non-smokers and also more likely to be married to unemployed spouses (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0001). This is the first study comparing obstetric outcomes of immigrant Turkish women with their Caucasian British counterparts. There was no significant difference in maternal or fetal outcomes, which could be attributed to the 'healthy migrant' theory, coupled with increased vigilance in ethnic minority pregnancies.</p> </abstract>