Allergic reactions compared between BN and Wistar rats after oral exposure to ovalbumin. (March 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sun, Na; Zhou, Cui; Pu, Qiankun; Wang, Jing; Huang, Kunlun; Che, Huilian
• Is Part Of: Journal of immunotoxicology. Volume 10:Number 1(2013)
• Page Start: 67
• Page End: 74
• Publication Date: 2013-03
• Subjects: Immunotoxicology -- Periodicals; Poisons -- Immunology -- Periodicals; Environmental health -- Periodicals; 616.97
• DOI: 10.3109/1547691X.2012.693546
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1547-691X

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>There is currently no validated animal model for evaluating the potential allergenicity of food proteins. This study aimed to compare the allergic reactions between BN and Wistar rats after oral exposure to ovalbumin (OVA) by studying immune responses and clinical manifestations. Female BN and Wistar rats were orally exposed to OVA on days 1 and 14, and thereafter daily from day 15 to day 42. Sera and plasma were screened for OVA-specific antibodies and histamine. On day 49, all the OVA-sensitized animals were orally challenged with OVA before blood pressure was measured. One day later (on day 50), histopathology and differential cell counts were performed. The results indicate that oral exposure of BN rats to OVA yielded IgE, IgG, and IgG<sub>2a</sub> antibody responses that were generally of higher levels than those observed in Wistar rats (<italic>p</italic> < 0.05). However, the Wistar rats presented with more serious clinical manifestations and histopathologic changes that could have serious implications for any OVA-induced anaphylaxis. The studies here proved that OVA-sensitized BN and Wistar rats evinced different immune responses and clinical manifestations; these outcomes suggested that the two rat strains might differ in their immunologic mechanisms of allergy and that there was no correlation between immune responses and the severity of clinical symptoms. To be clear, the data from these studies should be viewed as 'preliminary', as only a single protein allergen was examined. Accordingly, further studies are needed to compare the allergic reactions between BN and Wistar rats by using purified strong-, weak-, and non-allergenic proteins based on the experiments reported here.</p> </abstract>