DIAGNOSTIC SENSITIVITY AND INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT OF RADIOGRAPHY AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY FOR DETECTING TROCHLEAR RIDGE OSTEOCHONDROSIS LESIONS IN THE EQUINE STIFLE. Issue 2 (26th December 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- DIAGNOSTIC SENSITIVITY AND INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT OF RADIOGRAPHY AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY FOR DETECTING TROCHLEAR RIDGE OSTEOCHONDROSIS LESIONS IN THE EQUINE STIFLE. Issue 2 (26th December 2012)
- Main Title:
- DIAGNOSTIC SENSITIVITY AND INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT OF RADIOGRAPHY AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY FOR DETECTING TROCHLEAR RIDGE OSTEOCHONDROSIS LESIONS IN THE EQUINE STIFLE
- Authors:
- Beccati, Francesca
Chalmers, Heather J.
Dante, Sara
Lotto, Eleonora
Pepe, Marco - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Osteochondrosis lesions commonly occur on the femoral trochlear ridges in horses and radiography and ultrasonography are routinely used to diagnose these lesions. However, poor correlation has been found between radiographic and arthroscopic findings of affected trochlear ridges. Interobserver agreement for ultrasonographic diagnoses and correlation between ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings have not been previously described. Objectives of this study were to describe diagnostic sensitivity and interobserver agreement of radiography and ultrasonography for detecting and grading osteochondrosis lesions of the equine trochlear ridges, using arthroscopy as the reference standard. Twenty‐two horses were sampled. Two observers independently recorded radiographic and ultrasonographic findings without knowledge of arthroscopic findings. Imaging findings were compared between observers and with arthroscopic findings. Agreement between observers was moderate to excellent (κ 0.48–0.86) for detecting lesions using radiography and good to excellent (κ 0.74–0.87) for grading lesions using radiography. Agreement between observers was good to excellent (κ 0.78–0.94) for detecting lesions using ultrasonography and very good to excellent (κ 0.86–0.93) for grading lesions using ultrasonography. Diagnostic sensitivity was 84–88% for radiography and 100% for ultrasonography. Diagnostic specificity<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Osteochondrosis lesions commonly occur on the femoral trochlear ridges in horses and radiography and ultrasonography are routinely used to diagnose these lesions. However, poor correlation has been found between radiographic and arthroscopic findings of affected trochlear ridges. Interobserver agreement for ultrasonographic diagnoses and correlation between ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings have not been previously described. Objectives of this study were to describe diagnostic sensitivity and interobserver agreement of radiography and ultrasonography for detecting and grading osteochondrosis lesions of the equine trochlear ridges, using arthroscopy as the reference standard. Twenty‐two horses were sampled. Two observers independently recorded radiographic and ultrasonographic findings without knowledge of arthroscopic findings. Imaging findings were compared between observers and with arthroscopic findings. Agreement between observers was moderate to excellent (κ 0.48–0.86) for detecting lesions using radiography and good to excellent (κ 0.74–0.87) for grading lesions using radiography. Agreement between observers was good to excellent (κ 0.78–0.94) for detecting lesions using ultrasonography and very good to excellent (κ 0.86–0.93) for grading lesions using ultrasonography. Diagnostic sensitivity was 84–88% for radiography and 100% for ultrasonography. Diagnostic specificity was 89–100% for radiography and 60–82% for ultrasonography. Agreement between radiography and arthroscopy was good (κ 0.64–0.78). Agreement between ultrasonography and arthroscopy was very good to excellent (κ 0.81–0.87). Findings from this study support ultrasound as a preferred method for predicting presence and severity of osteochondrosis lesions involving the femoral trochlear ridges in horses.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Veterinary radiology & ultrasound. Volume 54:Issue 2(2013)
- Journal:
- Veterinary radiology & ultrasound
- Issue:
- Volume 54:Issue 2(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 54, Issue 2 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 54
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0054-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 176
- Page End:
- 184
- Publication Date:
- 2012-12-26
- Subjects:
- Veterinary radiology -- Periodicals
Radiologie vétérinaire -- Périodiques
Échographie vétérinaire -- Périodiques
Radiography -- Periodicals
Ultrasonography -- Periodicals
Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Veterinary Medicine -- Periodicals
Societies, Medical -- Periodicals
636.089607 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-8261 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/vru ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1058-8183;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/vru ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/vru.12004 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1058-8183
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9229.281000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3711.xml