Evaluating the use of the interferon‐γ response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis‐specific antigens in patients with psoriasis prior to antitumour necrosis factor‐α therapy: a prospective head‐to‐head cross‐sectional study. (25th April 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluating the use of the interferon‐γ response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis‐specific antigens in patients with psoriasis prior to antitumour necrosis factor‐α therapy: a prospective head‐to‐head cross‐sectional study. (25th April 2013)
- Main Title:
- Evaluating the use of the interferon‐γ response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis‐specific antigens in patients with psoriasis prior to antitumour necrosis factor‐α therapy: a prospective head‐to‐head cross‐sectional study
- Authors:
- Martyn‐Simmons, C.L.
Mee, J.B.
Kirkham, B.W.
Groves, R.W.
Milburn, H.J. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Summary</title> <p> <bold>Background </bold> Targeted biological therapies have transformed the treatment of chronic inflammatory disease. However, reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is a significant risk with the use of antitumour necrosis factor (anti‐TNF)‐α therapy and screening is mandatory prior to treatment. The tuberculin skin test (TST) may be difficult to interpret in patients with inflammatory disease or receiving immunosuppressive therapies.</p> <p> <bold>Objectives </bold> The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the QuantiFERON<sup>®</sup>‐TB Gold In‐Tube (QFR) and T‐SPOT.TB (TSTB) interferon‐γ‐release assays (IGRA) against the TST in a cohort of patients commencing anti‐TNF‐α therapies for chronic inflammatory disease.</p> <p> <bold>Methods </bold> A prospective cross‐sectional study was undertaken at a London tertiary referral centre. Demographic data collected included TB risk factors. TST, QFR and TSTB were performed in all patients.</p> <p> <bold>Results </bold> Seventy patients with chronic plaque psoriasis were included in the study. Agreement between QFR and TSTB, excluding indeterminate results, was 89% (κ = 0·567), between QFR and TST 85% (κ = 0·313) and 81% (κ = 0·244) between TSTB and TST. There was no significant association with concomitant immunosuppression and either TST or IGRA results. Seven patients received chemoprophylaxis for LTBI diagnosed after clinical risk<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Summary</title> <p> <bold>Background </bold> Targeted biological therapies have transformed the treatment of chronic inflammatory disease. However, reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is a significant risk with the use of antitumour necrosis factor (anti‐TNF)‐α therapy and screening is mandatory prior to treatment. The tuberculin skin test (TST) may be difficult to interpret in patients with inflammatory disease or receiving immunosuppressive therapies.</p> <p> <bold>Objectives </bold> The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the QuantiFERON<sup>®</sup>‐TB Gold In‐Tube (QFR) and T‐SPOT.TB (TSTB) interferon‐γ‐release assays (IGRA) against the TST in a cohort of patients commencing anti‐TNF‐α therapies for chronic inflammatory disease.</p> <p> <bold>Methods </bold> A prospective cross‐sectional study was undertaken at a London tertiary referral centre. Demographic data collected included TB risk factors. TST, QFR and TSTB were performed in all patients.</p> <p> <bold>Results </bold> Seventy patients with chronic plaque psoriasis were included in the study. Agreement between QFR and TSTB, excluding indeterminate results, was 89% (κ = 0·567), between QFR and TST 85% (κ = 0·313) and 81% (κ = 0·244) between TSTB and TST. There was no significant association with concomitant immunosuppression and either TST or IGRA results. Seven patients received chemoprophylaxis for LTBI diagnosed after clinical risk assessment together with positive TST and/or IGRA. Three patients had positive results in all three tests.</p> <p> <bold>Conclusions </bold> While there was moderate overall agreement between QFR and TSTB and fair correlation between TST, QFR and TSTB, there were a number of discordant results, suggesting that a three‐pronged approach using TST, QFR and TSTB may be of additional benefit.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of dermatology. Volume 168:Number 5(2013:May)
- Journal:
- British journal of dermatology
- Issue:
- Volume 168:Number 5(2013:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 168, Issue 5 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 168
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0168-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 1012
- Page End:
- 1018
- Publication Date:
- 2013-04-25
- Subjects:
- Dermatology -- Periodicals
Skin -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2133 ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjd ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/bjd.12176 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-0963
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2307.400000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3681.xml