Fistula use after concurrent arteriovenous fistula formation and Tenckhoff catheter insertion. Issue 1 (17th December 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jiang, Simon H; Lan, Patrick G; Yeung, James; Gallagher, Martin
• Is Part Of: Nephrology. Volume 18:Issue 1(2013)
• Page Start: 22
• Page End: 25
• Publication Date: 2012-12-17
• Subjects: Nephrology -- Periodicals; Kidneys -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Nephrologists -- Periodicals; 616.61; 616.61
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2012.01658.x
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1320-5358

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>A significant proportion of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients will have abrupt technique failure requiring conversion to haemodialysis, often using temporary vascular catheters as bridging access. However, vascular catheter use has been associated with increased mortality and great effort has been made to reduce their use. Just under two decades ago, a trial of dual arteriovenous fistula (AVF) formation and Tenckhoff catheter insertion reported only 4% of those in whom back‐up fistulae were formed ever used them. Patient demographic, surgical technique and fistula care over those decades have changed substantially, potentially making this practice feasible. Thirty‐five selected patients at Concord Repatriation and General Hospital had AVF formed at the time of Tenckhoff insertion and were entered prospectively into a vascular access database. We retrospectively examined this database with a median follow up of 345 days (interquartile range 183–658). Thirty‐one per cent of all patients used the preformed AVF, and a further 19% who were still on PD had clinically functioning AVF. The vast majority (62%) had abrupt PD technique failure. This is a marked difference to dated reports of AVF use after concurrent PD and AVF formation. It raises the possibility that the formation of back‐up fistula may be another method to reduce the need for vascular catheter use.</p> </abstract>