Are two‐stage hepatectomies associated with more complications than one‐stage procedures?. Issue 6 (28th November 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Are two‐stage hepatectomies associated with more complications than one‐stage procedures?. Issue 6 (28th November 2012)
- Main Title:
- Are two‐stage hepatectomies associated with more complications than one‐stage procedures?
- Authors:
- Schadde, Erik
Slankamenac, Ksenija
Breitenstein, Stefan
Lesurtel, Mickael
De Oliveira, Michelle
Beck‐Schimmer, Beatrice
Dutkowski, Philipp
Clavien, Pierre‐Alain - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="hpb12001-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Two‐stage liver resections with portal vein occlusion have become standard in patients with low volume future liver remnants. Whether they are associated with more complications is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare complications of one‐ and two‐stage resections in a retrospective study.</p> </sec> <sec id="hpb12001-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Patients with two‐stage right liver resections with a previous portal vein occlusion were compared with patients with one‐stage right liver resections between 2002 and 2010. Primary endpoints were the incidence of complications by severity. Secondary endpoints were mortality, post‐operative liver‐ and kidney function tests, length of hospitalization and transfusion events. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to adjust for confounders.</p> </sec> <sec id="hpb12001-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The groups were comparable except for right trisectionectomies, pre‐operative chemotherapy and underlying liver disease. Overall complications occurred in 25 out of 35 patients with two‐stage and 106 out of 163 in one‐stage procedures. Severe complications were observed in 47 out of 163 patients versus 9 out of 35 patients, respectively. Two‐stage procedures had no increased adjusted risk for complications [relative risk (RR) 0.9,<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="hpb12001-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Two‐stage liver resections with portal vein occlusion have become standard in patients with low volume future liver remnants. Whether they are associated with more complications is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare complications of one‐ and two‐stage resections in a retrospective study.</p> </sec> <sec id="hpb12001-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Patients with two‐stage right liver resections with a previous portal vein occlusion were compared with patients with one‐stage right liver resections between 2002 and 2010. Primary endpoints were the incidence of complications by severity. Secondary endpoints were mortality, post‐operative liver‐ and kidney function tests, length of hospitalization and transfusion events. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to adjust for confounders.</p> </sec> <sec id="hpb12001-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The groups were comparable except for right trisectionectomies, pre‐operative chemotherapy and underlying liver disease. Overall complications occurred in 25 out of 35 patients with two‐stage and 106 out of 163 in one‐stage procedures. Severe complications were observed in 47 out of 163 patients versus 9 out of 35 patients, respectively. Two‐stage procedures had no increased adjusted risk for complications [relative risk (RR) 0.9, <italic>P =</italic> 0.79]. Mortality (5.7% versus 3.7%) and post‐operative liver failure rates (2.9% versus 3.1%) were low. Secondary endpoints showed no adjusted differences in risk.</p> </sec> <sec id="hpb12001-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>This study suggests that liver resections in two stages are not associated with more post‐operative complications than one‐stage resections. These results should support the adoption of two‐stage liver resections in selected patients.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- HPB. Volume 15:Issue 6(2013:Jun.)
- Journal:
- HPB
- Issue:
- Volume 15:Issue 6(2013:Jun.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 15, Issue 6 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0015-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 411
- Page End:
- 417
- Publication Date:
- 2012-11-28
- Subjects:
- Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Biliary tract -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Pancreas -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.362005 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.journals.elsevier.com/hpb/ ↗
http://www.hpbonline.org/current ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1477-2574 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/hpb.12001 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1365-182X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4335.262340
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4089.xml