A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. Issue 4 (28th September 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. Issue 4 (28th September 2012)
- Main Title:
- A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways
- Authors:
- Coolsen, Mariëlle M. E.
Wong‐Lun‐Hing, Edgar M.
van, Ronald M.
van der, Aart A.
Slim, Karem
Lassen, Kristoffer
Dejong, Cornelis H. C. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="hpb572-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) or fast‐track protocols have been implemented in different fields of surgery to attenuate the surgical stress response and accelerate recovery. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature on outcomes of ERAS protocols applied in liver surgery.</p> </sec> <sec id="hpb572-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>The MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case–control studies and case series published between January 1966 and October 2011 comparing adult patients undergoing elective liver surgery in an ERAS programme with those treated in a conventional manner. The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay (LoS). Secondary outcome measures were time to functional recovery, and complication, readmission and mortality rates.</p> </sec> <sec id="hpb572-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>A total of 307 articles were found, six of which were included in the review. These comprised two RCTs, three case–control studies and one retrospective case series. Median LoS ranged from 4 days in an ERAS group to 11 days in a control group. Morbidity, mortality and readmission rates did not differ significantly between the groups. Only two studies assessed time to functional recovery.<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="hpb572-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) or fast‐track protocols have been implemented in different fields of surgery to attenuate the surgical stress response and accelerate recovery. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature on outcomes of ERAS protocols applied in liver surgery.</p> </sec> <sec id="hpb572-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>The MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case–control studies and case series published between January 1966 and October 2011 comparing adult patients undergoing elective liver surgery in an ERAS programme with those treated in a conventional manner. The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay (LoS). Secondary outcome measures were time to functional recovery, and complication, readmission and mortality rates.</p> </sec> <sec id="hpb572-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>A total of 307 articles were found, six of which were included in the review. These comprised two RCTs, three case–control studies and one retrospective case series. Median LoS ranged from 4 days in an ERAS group to 11 days in a control group. Morbidity, mortality and readmission rates did not differ significantly between the groups. Only two studies assessed time to functional recovery. Functional recovery in these studies was reached 2 days before discharge.</p> </sec> <sec id="hpb572-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>This systematic review suggests that ERAS protocols can be successfully implemented in liver surgery. Length of stay is reduced without compromising morbidity, mortality or readmission rates.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- HPB. Volume 15:Issue 4(2013:Apr.)
- Journal:
- HPB
- Issue:
- Volume 15:Issue 4(2013:Apr.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 15, Issue 4 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0015-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 245
- Page End:
- 251
- Publication Date:
- 2012-09-28
- Subjects:
- Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Biliary tract -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Pancreas -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.362005 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.journals.elsevier.com/hpb/ ↗
http://www.hpbonline.org/current ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1477-2574 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00572.x ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1365-182X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4335.262340
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3644.xml