The Pricing of Risk and Sentiment: A Study of Executive Stock Options. Issue 1 (4th September 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chang, Charles; Chen, Li‐jiun; Fuh, Cheng‐der
• Is Part Of: Financial management. Volume 42:Issue 1(2013:Spring)
• Page Start: 79
• Page End: 99
• Publication Date: 2012-09-04
• Subjects: Corporations -- Finance -- Periodicals; 658.1505
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2012.01216.x
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0046-3892

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Option pricing models accounting for illiquidity generally imply the options are valued at a discount to the Black‐Scholes value. Our model considers the role of sentiment, which offsets illiquidity. Using executive stock options and compensation data from 1992 to 2004 for S&amp;P 1500 firms, we find that executives value employee stock options (ESOs) at a 48% premium to the Black‐Scholes value. These premia are explained by a sentiment level of 12% in risk‐adjusted, annualized return, suggesting a high level of executive overconfidence. Subjective value relates negatively to illiquidity and idiosyncratic risk, and positively to sentiment in all specifications, consistent with the offsetting roles of sentiment and risk aversion.</p> </abstract>