Cognitive‐self consciousness and metacognitive beliefs: Stress sensitization in individuals at ultra‐high risk of developing psychosis. (7th September 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Cognitive‐self consciousness and metacognitive beliefs: Stress sensitization in individuals at ultra‐high risk of developing psychosis. (7th September 2012)
- Main Title:
- Cognitive‐self consciousness and metacognitive beliefs: Stress sensitization in individuals at ultra‐high risk of developing psychosis
- Authors:
- Palmier‐Claus, J. E.
Dunn, G.
Taylor, H.
Morrison, A. P.
Lewis, S. W. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="sec-sum-1" sec-type="section"> <p> <bold>Objective:</bold> Metacognitive beliefs (MCB) may guide information and attention processes, increasing affective and symptomatic reactions to stressful events. Cognitive self‐consciousness (CSC; i.e., a preoccupation with one's thoughts) may increase awareness of MCB, potentially triggering the onset of psychotic symptoms. This study tested the hypotheses that (1), MCB would moderate affective and symptomatic reactions to stress in individuals at ultra‐high risk (UHR) of developing psychosis, and (2), greater CSC would precede worsening in psychotic symptoms in individuals with strong MCB.</p> <p> <bold>Method:</bold> Twenty‐seven individuals at UHR of developing psychosis completed a self‐report diary when prompted by an electronic wristwatch several times each day for 6 days (experience sampling).</p> <p> <bold>Results:</bold> MCB moderated the association between affective, but not symptomatic, responses to social stress. CSC preceded the subsequent occurrence of hallucinations in individuals who reported strong beliefs about the need to control their thoughts.</p> <p> <bold>Conclusions:</bold> The data suggest that MCB sensitize an individual to social stressors. CSC may represent times where an individual is aware that their thoughts are uncontrollable, and therefore contradicting their MCB, motivating them to make an<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="sec-sum-1" sec-type="section"> <p> <bold>Objective:</bold> Metacognitive beliefs (MCB) may guide information and attention processes, increasing affective and symptomatic reactions to stressful events. Cognitive self‐consciousness (CSC; i.e., a preoccupation with one's thoughts) may increase awareness of MCB, potentially triggering the onset of psychotic symptoms. This study tested the hypotheses that (1), MCB would moderate affective and symptomatic reactions to stress in individuals at ultra‐high risk (UHR) of developing psychosis, and (2), greater CSC would precede worsening in psychotic symptoms in individuals with strong MCB.</p> <p> <bold>Method:</bold> Twenty‐seven individuals at UHR of developing psychosis completed a self‐report diary when prompted by an electronic wristwatch several times each day for 6 days (experience sampling).</p> <p> <bold>Results:</bold> MCB moderated the association between affective, but not symptomatic, responses to social stress. CSC preceded the subsequent occurrence of hallucinations in individuals who reported strong beliefs about the need to control their thoughts.</p> <p> <bold>Conclusions:</bold> The data suggest that MCB sensitize an individual to social stressors. CSC may represent times where an individual is aware that their thoughts are uncontrollable, and therefore contradicting their MCB, motivating them to make an external attribution. The findings have implications for improving the effectiveness of interventions for people experiencing hallucinations.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-1" sec-type="section"> <title>Practitioner Points</title> <p> <list id="l1" list-type="simple"> <list-item> <label> </label> <p>Cognitive self‐consciousness may precede the onset of hallucinations in individuals with a strong belief that they need to control their thoughts.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <label> </label> <p>Metacognitive beliefs may increase emotional reactions to everyday irritations and hassles.</p> </list-item> </list> </p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-2" sec-type="section"> <title>Limitations</title> <p> <list id="l2" list-type="simple"> <list-item> <label> </label> <p>Only 27 individuals were included in the final analysis.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <label> </label> <p>Causality could not be established.</p> </list-item> </list> </p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of clinical psychology. Volume 52:Number 1(2013:Mar.)
- Journal:
- British journal of clinical psychology
- Issue:
- Volume 52:Number 1(2013:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 52, Issue 1 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 52
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0052-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 26
- Page End:
- 41
- Publication Date:
- 2012-09-07
- Subjects:
- 616.89
- Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8260 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2012.02043.x ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0144-6657
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2307.230000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3157.xml