Quantification of the relation between surface morphodynamics and subsurface sedimentological product in sandy braided rivers. Issue 3 (22nd October 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Parker, Natalie O.; Sambrook Smith, Gregory H.; Ashworth, Philip J.; Best, James L.; Lane, Stuart N.; Lunt, Ian A.; Simpson, Christopher J.; Thomas, Roberte.
• Is Part Of: Sedimentology. Volume 60:Issue 3(2013)
• Page Start: 820
• Page End: 839
• Publication Date: 2012-10-22
• Subjects: Sedimentology -- Periodicals; 552.5
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01364.x
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0037-0746

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>This study uses digital elevation models and ground‐penetrating radar to quantify the relation between the surface morphodynamics and subsurface sedimentology in the sandy braided South Saskatchewan River, Canada. A unique aspect of the methodology is that both digital elevation model <italic>and</italic> ground‐penetrating radar data were collected from the same locations in 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, thus enabling the surface morphodynamics to be tied explicitly to the associated evolving depositional product. The occurrence of a large flood in 2005 also allowed the influence of discharge to be assessed with respect to the process–product relationship. The data demonstrate that the morphology of the study reach evolved even during modest discharges, but more extensive erosion was caused by the large flood. In addition, the study reach was dominated by compound bars before the flood, but switched to being dominated by unit bars during and after the flood. The extent to which the subsurface deposits (the 'product') were modified by the surface morphodynamics (the 'process') was quantified using the changes in radar‐facies recorded in sequential ground‐penetrating radar surveys. These surveys reveal that during the large flood there was an increase in the proportion of facies associated with bar margin accretion and larger dunes. In subsequent years, these facies became truncated and replaced with facies associated with smaller dune sets. This analysis shows that unit bars generally become truncated more laterally than vertically and, thus, they lose the high‐angle bar margin deposits and smaller scale bar‐top deposits. In general, the only fragments that remain of the unit bars are dune sets, thus making identification of the original unit barform problematic. This novel data set has implications for what may ultimately become preserved in the rock record.</p> </abstract>