Allocation concealment: a methodological review. Issue 4 (7th May 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Allocation concealment: a methodological review. Issue 4 (7th May 2013)
- Main Title:
- Allocation concealment: a methodological review
- Authors:
- Clark, Laura
Schmidt, Ulrike
Tharmanathan, Puvan
Adamson, Joy
Hewitt, Catherine
Torgerson, David - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jep12032-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Rationale, aims and objectives</title> <p>The accurate reporting of the trial methodology and results is essential for accurate judgement on the quality of the research. This review aims to assess the impact of the adequacy of allocation concealment on treatment effect estimates.</p> </sec> <sec id="jep12032-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A search was performed in MEDLINE (via the Ovid platform) to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indexed in January 2011 within its set of 'core clinical journals'. Meta‐regression was undertaken on a subset of two arm trials to quantify the association between adequacy of allocation concealment and effect size.</p> </sec> <sec id="jep12032-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Adequate allocation concealment methods were used in 27% (<italic>n</italic> = 23) of included trials. There was insufficient information given in 68% (<italic>n</italic> = 58) of trials to make a judgement on allocation concealment. Meta‐regression showed that there was a trend, not statistically significant, towards a smaller effect size between adequacy of allocation concealment and effect sizes.</p> </sec> <sec id="jep12032-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>This review highlighted that research needs to be reported to a higher standard and there are many trials reporting<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jep12032-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Rationale, aims and objectives</title> <p>The accurate reporting of the trial methodology and results is essential for accurate judgement on the quality of the research. This review aims to assess the impact of the adequacy of allocation concealment on treatment effect estimates.</p> </sec> <sec id="jep12032-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A search was performed in MEDLINE (via the Ovid platform) to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indexed in January 2011 within its set of 'core clinical journals'. Meta‐regression was undertaken on a subset of two arm trials to quantify the association between adequacy of allocation concealment and effect size.</p> </sec> <sec id="jep12032-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Adequate allocation concealment methods were used in 27% (<italic>n</italic> = 23) of included trials. There was insufficient information given in 68% (<italic>n</italic> = 58) of trials to make a judgement on allocation concealment. Meta‐regression showed that there was a trend, not statistically significant, towards a smaller effect size between adequacy of allocation concealment and effect sizes.</p> </sec> <sec id="jep12032-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>This review highlighted that research needs to be reported to a higher standard and there are many trials reporting poor methods of allocation concealment within the small sample of trials included in this review.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. Volume 19:Issue 4(2013)
- Journal:
- Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
- Issue:
- Volume 19:Issue 4(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 19, Issue 4 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 19
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0019-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 708
- Page End:
- 712
- Publication Date:
- 2013-05-07
- Subjects:
- Clinical medicine -- Periodicals
616.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2753 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jep.12032 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1356-1294
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4979.640800
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3281.xml