Some Fishy Things About Scales: Macro- and Micro-approaches to Later Prehistoric and Romano-British Field Systems. (1st June 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chadwick, Adrian
• Is Part Of: Landscapes. Volume 14:Number 1(2013)
• Page Start: 13
• Page End: 32
• Publication Date: 2013-06-01
• Subjects: Landscape -- History -- Periodicals; Landscape -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Landscape archaeology -- Periodicals; Historical geography -- Periodicals; 911.09
• DOI: 10.1179/1466203513Z.0000000002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1466-2035

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p> <bold> <italic>Abstract</italic> </bold> </p> <p>In British archaeology, there are apparent tensions between macro-level, landscape-wide analyses, and micro-level, site-based approaches. Macro-level analyses are based on techniques and technologies such as aerial photograph transcriptions, LiDAR data and GIS-based mapping, as exemplified in many excellent National Mapping Programme studies and several new large-scale research projects. These studies have proved invaluable in mapping extensive areas of archaeology, and GIS-based data can be interrogated through many forms of spatial analysis. At the same time, developer-funded fieldwork has provided opportunities to excavate and record large areas thus contributing a significant amount of new information to field system studies at a detailed, localised level or micro-scale. This difference between scales is explored through a series of case studies focusing on later prehistoric and Romano-British field systems. Different approaches and methodological, temporal and interpretative scales are examined, and the creative rather than negative aspects of such tensions are explored.</p> </abstract>