WHY IMPROVING IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY INCREASES TOTAL VOLUME OF CONSUMPTIVE USE1. (24th May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Contor, Bryce A.; Taylor, R. Garth; Schultz, Bart
• Is Part Of: Irrigation and drainage. Volume 62:Number 3(2013:Jul.)
• Page Start: 273
• Page End: 280
• Publication Date: 2013-05-24
• Subjects: Irrigation engineering -- Periodicals; Drainage -- Periodicals; Flood control -- Periodicals; Sustainable agriculture -- Periodicals; 627.52
• DOI: 10.1002/ird.1717
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1531-0353

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <p>The common prescription for dealing with limited supplies of water is to improve irrigation efficiency, that is, to reduce gross delivery to farm fields while maintaining full crop production. The public and some policy makers continue to assume that the water thus saved constitutes a new supply that may be applied to other uses. Scientists and hydrologists have long understood that the nonconsumed fraction of applied water often becomes the source for another human or ecosystem purpose after leaving the field, and irrigation improvements interrupt these uses. Thoughtful researchers have provided valuable guidance in conceptual frameworks and analysis procedures to address this issue. Researchers have also noted empirically that total consumptive use often increases when efficiency improves, and have cited case‐specific reasons that this occurs. This paper shows it is a general case arising from rational producer behavior in equating the marginal cost of a production input (irrigation water) with its marginal benefit. At any nonzero marginal cost of water, improving irrigation efficiency enables the irrigator to be willing and able to purchase a quantity of irrigation water that sustains more consumptive use than was possible with the prior, less efficient system.</p> <p>A case study indicates that improving efficiency from 60 to 80% reduces field delivery of irrigation water by 15% but increases consumptive use by 3%. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p> </abstract>