Psychosocial impact of lymphedema: a systematic review of literature from 2004 to 2011. Issue 7 (9th October 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fu, Mei R.; Ridner, Sheila H.; Hu, Sophia H.; Stewart, Bob R.; Cormier, Janice N.; Armer, Jane M.
• Is Part Of: Psycho-oncology. Volume 22:Issue 7(2013)
• Page Start: 1466
• Page End: 1484
• Publication Date: 2012-10-09
• Subjects: Cancer -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- psychology -- Periodicals; 616.9940019
• DOI: 10.1002/pon.3201
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1057-9249

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="pon3201-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the level of evidence of contemporary peer‐reviewed literature published from 2004 to 2011 on the psychosocial impact of lymphedema.</p> </sec> <sec id="pon3201-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Eleven electronic databases were searched and 1311 articles retrieved; 23 met inclusion criteria. Twelve articles utilized qualitative methodology and 11 used quantitative methodology. An established quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies.</p> </sec> <sec id="pon3201-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The overall quality of the 23 included studies was adequate. A critical limitation of current literature is the lack of conceptual or operational definitions for the concept of psychosocial impact. Quantitative studies showed statistically significant poorer social well‐being in persons with lymphedema, including perceptions related to body image, appearance, sexuality, and social barriers. No statistically significant differences were found between persons with and without lymphedema in the domains of emotional well‐being (happy or sad) and psychological distress (depression and anxiety). All 12 of the qualitative studies consistently described negative psychological impact (negative self‐identity, emotional disturbance, and psychological distress) and negative social impact (marginalization, financial burden, perceived diminished sexuality, social isolation, perceived social abandonment, public insensitivity, and non‐supportive work environment). Factors associated with psychosocial impact were also identified.</p> </sec> <sec id="pon3201-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Lymphedema has a negative psychosocial impact on affected individuals. The current review sheds light on the conceptualization and operationalization of the definitions of psychosocial impact with respect to lymphedema. Development of a lymphedema‐specific instrument is needed to better characterize the impact of lymphedema and to examine the factors contributing to these outcomes in cancer and non‐cancer‐related populations. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p> </sec> </abstract>