Randomized, controlled, parallel‐group trial of routine prophylaxis vs. on‐demand treatment with sucrose‐formulated recombinant factor VIII in adults with severe hemophilia A (SPINART). Issue 6 (3rd July 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Randomized, controlled, parallel‐group trial of routine prophylaxis vs. on‐demand treatment with sucrose‐formulated recombinant factor VIII in adults with severe hemophilia A (SPINART). Issue 6 (3rd July 2013)
- Main Title:
- Randomized, controlled, parallel‐group trial of routine prophylaxis vs. on‐demand treatment with sucrose‐formulated recombinant factor VIII in adults with severe hemophilia A (SPINART)
- Authors:
- Manco‐Johnson, M. J.
Kempton, C. L.
Reding, M. T.
Lissitchkov, T.
Goranov, S.
Gercheva, L.
Rusen, L.
Ghinea, M.
Uscatescu, V.
Rescia, V.
Hong, W. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="jth12202-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="jth12202-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>The benefits of routine prophylaxis vs. on‐demand treatment with factor VIII products have not been evaluated in controlled clinical trials in older patients with hemophilia A.</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12202-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>To report results from a preplanned analysis of data from the first year of the 3‐year SPINART study, which compares routine prophylaxis with on‐demand treatment with sucrose‐formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII‐FS).</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12202-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Patients/Methods</title> <p>SPINART is an open‐label, randomized, controlled, parallel‐group, multinational trial. Males aged 12–50 years with severe hemophilia A, ≥ 150 days of exposure to FVIII, no FVIII inhibitors, no prophylaxis for &gt; 12 consecutive months in the past 5 years and 6–24 bleeding episodes in the preceding 6 months were randomized 1 : 1 to rFVIII‐FS prophylaxis (25 IU kg<sup>−1</sup>, three times weekly) or on‐demand treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint, number of total bleeding episodes in the intent‐to‐treat population, was analyzed after the last patient had completed 1 year of follow‐up. A negative binomial model was used for the primary endpoint analysis; analysis of variance was used for confirmatory analysis of annualized bleeding rates.</p> </sec> <sec<abstract abstract-type="main" id="jth12202-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="jth12202-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>The benefits of routine prophylaxis vs. on‐demand treatment with factor VIII products have not been evaluated in controlled clinical trials in older patients with hemophilia A.</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12202-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>To report results from a preplanned analysis of data from the first year of the 3‐year SPINART study, which compares routine prophylaxis with on‐demand treatment with sucrose‐formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII‐FS).</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12202-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Patients/Methods</title> <p>SPINART is an open‐label, randomized, controlled, parallel‐group, multinational trial. Males aged 12–50 years with severe hemophilia A, ≥ 150 days of exposure to FVIII, no FVIII inhibitors, no prophylaxis for &gt; 12 consecutive months in the past 5 years and 6–24 bleeding episodes in the preceding 6 months were randomized 1 : 1 to rFVIII‐FS prophylaxis (25 IU kg<sup>−1</sup>, three times weekly) or on‐demand treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint, number of total bleeding episodes in the intent‐to‐treat population, was analyzed after the last patient had completed 1 year of follow‐up. A negative binomial model was used for the primary endpoint analysis; analysis of variance was used for confirmatory analysis of annualized bleeding rates.</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12202-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Eighty‐four patients were enrolled and analyzed (<italic>n</italic> = 42 per group; mean age, 30.6 years; median treatment duration, 1.7 years). The median number of total bleeding episodes and total bleeding episodes per year were significantly lower with prophylaxis than with on‐demand treatment (total, 0 vs. 54.5; total per year, 0 vs. 27.9; both <italic>P </italic>&lt; 0.0001). No treatment‐related adverse events occurred, and no patients developed FVIII inhibitors.</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12202-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Routine prophylaxis with rFVIII‐FS leads to a significant reduction in bleeding as compared with on‐demand treatment. Adverse events were consistent with the established rFVIII‐FS safety profile.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis. Volume 11:Issue 6(2013)
- Journal:
- Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis
- Issue:
- Volume 11:Issue 6(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 11, Issue 6 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0011-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 1119
- Page End:
- 1127
- Publication Date:
- 2013-07-03
- Subjects:
- Thrombosis -- Periodicals
Hemostasis -- Periodicals
Blood coagulation disorders -- Periodicals
616.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1538-7836 ↗
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/jth ↗
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-thrombosis-and-haemostasis ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jth.12202 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1538-7933
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5069.345000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3141.xml