In vivo evaluation of the iPex and Root ZX electronic apex locators using various irrigants. (28th March 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Duran‐Sindreu, F.; Gomes, S.; Stöber, E.; Mercadé, M.; Jané, L.; Roig, M.
• Is Part Of: International endontic journal. Volume 46:Number 8(2013:Aug.)
• Page Start: 769
• Page End: 774
• Publication Date: 2013-03-28
• Subjects: Endodontics -- Periodicals; 617.6342
• DOI: 10.1111/iej.12057
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-2885

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en" id="iej12057-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="iej12057-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>To evaluate <italic>in vivo</italic> the performance of the iPex and Root ZX electronic apex locators (EALs) in the presence of several irrigant solutions: 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 2% chlorhexidine (CHX).</p> </sec> <sec id="iej12057-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methodology</title> <p>Thirty‐two single‐rooted human teeth that were scheduled for extraction were selected. Teeth with metallic restorations, fractures, root resorption, pulp necrosis or open apices were not included The working length (WL) was determined electronically for the root canals with the iPex and Root ZX EALs in the presence of two different irrigant solutions, 2.5% NaOCl and 2% CHX. After the teeth had been extracted, a size 10 K‐file was used to determine the reference working length (RWL), which was established at 0.5 mm short of the major foramen. In each case, the RWL was subtracted from the electronic measurements. Positive values indicated electronic measurements that exceeded the RWL (long measurements), whereas negative values indicated measurements that were short of the RWL. The values obtained with the different irrigants and EALs were compared using the paired <italic>t</italic>‐test. Significance was set at <italic>P</italic> < 0.05.</p> </sec> <sec id="iej12057-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The accuracy of the iPex nor Root ZX EAL was not affected by 2.5% NaOCl or 2% CHX (<italic>P</italic> > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed between the readings of the iPex and Root ZX, irrespective of whether 2.5% NaOCl or 2% CHX was used as the irrigant (<italic>P</italic> < 0.05). The iPex was less accurate than the Root ZX in determining the RWL.</p> </sec> <sec id="iej12057-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>The accuracy of neither the iPex nor Root ZX EAL was affected by the irrigant used. However, the iPex was less accurate than the Root ZX in determining the RWL both for 2.5% NaOCl and for 2% CHX.</p> </sec> </abstract>