Optimal temperature for malaria transmission is dramatically lower than previously predicted. (11th October 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mordecai, Erin A.; Paaijmans, Krijn P.; Johnson, Leah R.; Balzer, Christian; Ben‐Horin, Tal; de, Emily; McNally, Amy; Pawar, Samraat; Ryan, Sadie J.; Smith, Thomas C.; Lafferty, Kevin D.; Thrall, Peter
• Is Part Of: Ecology letters. Volume 16:Number 1(2013:Jan.)
• Page Start: 22
• Page End: 30
• Publication Date: 2012-10-11
• Subjects: Ecology -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/ele.12015
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1461-023X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ele12015-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>The ecology of mosquito vectors and malaria parasites affect the incidence, seasonal transmission and geographical range of malaria. Most malaria models to date assume constant or linear responses of mosquito and parasite life‐history traits to temperature, predicting optimal transmission at 31 °C. These models are at odds with field observations of transmission dating back nearly a century. We build a model with more realistic ecological assumptions about the thermal physiology of insects. Our model, which includes empirically derived nonlinear thermal responses, predicts optimal malaria transmission at 25 °C (6 °C lower than previous models). Moreover, the model predicts that transmission decreases dramatically at temperatures &gt; 28 °C, altering predictions about how climate change will affect malaria. A large data set on malaria transmission risk in Africa validates both the 25 °C optimum and the decline above 28 °C. Using these more accurate nonlinear thermal‐response models will aid in understanding the effects of current and future temperature regimes on disease transmission.</p> </abstract>