Assessing the extent to which temporal changes in waterbird community composition are driven by either local, regional or global factors. Issue 2 (30th October 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tománková, Irena; Boland, Helen; Reid, Neil; Fox, Anthony D.
• Is Part Of: Aquatic conservation. Volume 23:Issue 2(2013)
• Page Start: 343
• Page End: 355
• Publication Date: 2012-10-30
• Subjects: Aquatic ecology -- Periodicals; Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals; Aquatic resources -- Periodicals; 333.95216
• DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2303
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1052-7613

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <p> <list list-type="order"> <list-item> <p>Lough Neagh and Lough Beg Special Protection Area (SPA, hereafter Lough Neagh) is an important non‐estuarine site in Britain and Ireland for overwintering wildfowl. Multivariate analysis of the winter counts showed a state‐shift in the waterbird community following winter 2000/2001, mostly due to rapid declines in abundance (46–57% declines in the mean mid‐winter January counts between 1993–2000 and 2002–2009) of members of the diving duck guild (pochard <italic>Aythya ferina</italic>, tufted duck <italic>Aythya fuligula</italic> and goldeneye <italic>Bucephala clangula</italic>) and coot (<italic>Fulica atra</italic>), a submerged macrophyte feeder.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Only pochard showed correlations between declines at Lough Neagh and those of overall species flyway population indices to suggest that global changes could contribute to declines at the site. However, indices from the Republic of Ireland showed no overall decline in the rest of Ireland. Tufted duck indices at the site were inversely related to indices in Great Britain. Lough Neagh goldeneye indices were positively correlated with indices in the Republic of Ireland and Great Britain, suggesting that short‐stopping could contribute to declines at the site. Coot declines at Lough Neagh did not correlate with trends elsewhere, suggesting local factors involved in the decline.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>These analyses indicate that although there are potentially different explanations for the dramatic declines in these four waterbird species at this site, the simultaneous nature of the declines across two feeding guilds strongly suggest that local factors (such as loss of submerged macrophytes and benthic invertebrates) were involved. An assessment of the food supply, local disturbance and other factors at Lough Neagh is required to find an explanation for the observed adverse trends in wintering numbers of the affected species.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>This study highlights the potential of waterbird community structure to reflect the status of aquatic systems, but confirms the need to establish site‐specific factors responsible for the observed changes in abundance of key waterbird species at a site.</p> </list-item> </list> </p> <p>Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p> </abstract>