An Evaluation of the Prescription of Opioids for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain by Australian General Practitioners. Issue 1 (28th December 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- An Evaluation of the Prescription of Opioids for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain by Australian General Practitioners. Issue 1 (28th December 2012)
- Main Title:
- An Evaluation of the Prescription of Opioids for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain by Australian General Practitioners
- Authors:
- Holliday, Simon
Magin, Parker
Dunbabin, Janet
Oldmeadow, Christopher
Henry, Julie‐Marie
Lintzeris, Nicholas
Attia, John
Goode, Susan
Dunlop, Adrian - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="pme1527-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective.</title> <p>Our objective was to evaluate the quality of opioid analgesia prescribing in chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) by general practitioners (GPs, family physicians).</p> </sec> <sec id="pme1527-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Design.</title> <p>An anonymous, cross‐sectional questionnaire‐based survey.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme1527-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Setting.</title> <p>The setting was five Australian divisions of general practice (geographically based associations of GPs).</p> </sec> <sec id="pme1527-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods.</title> <p>A questionnaire was mailed to all division members. Outcome measures were adherence to individual recommendations of locally derived CNMP practice guidelines.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme1527-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Results.</title> <p>We received 404 responses (response rate 23.3%). In the previous fortnight, GPs prescribed long‐term continuous opioids for CNMP for a median of 4 and a mean of 7.1 (±8.7) patients with CNMP. Guideline concordance (GLC) was poor, with no GP always compliant with all guideline items, and only 31% GPs usually employing most items. GLC was highest for the avoidance of high dosages or fast‐acting formulations. It was lowest for strategies minimizing individual and public health harms, such as the initiation of opioids on a time‐limited trial<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="pme1527-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective.</title> <p>Our objective was to evaluate the quality of opioid analgesia prescribing in chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) by general practitioners (GPs, family physicians).</p> </sec> <sec id="pme1527-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Design.</title> <p>An anonymous, cross‐sectional questionnaire‐based survey.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme1527-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Setting.</title> <p>The setting was five Australian divisions of general practice (geographically based associations of GPs).</p> </sec> <sec id="pme1527-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods.</title> <p>A questionnaire was mailed to all division members. Outcome measures were adherence to individual recommendations of locally derived CNMP practice guidelines.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme1527-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Results.</title> <p>We received 404 responses (response rate 23.3%). In the previous fortnight, GPs prescribed long‐term continuous opioids for CNMP for a median of 4 and a mean of 7.1 (±8.7) patients with CNMP. Guideline concordance (GLC) was poor, with no GP always compliant with all guideline items, and only 31% GPs usually employing most items. GLC was highest for the avoidance of high dosages or fast‐acting formulations. It was lowest for strategies minimizing individual and public health harms, such as the initiation of opioids on a time‐limited trial basis, use of contracts, and the preclusion or management of aberrant behaviors. GLC was positively associated with relevant training or qualifications, registration with the Australian Prescription Drug Monitoring Programme, being an opioid substitution therapy prescriber, and female gender.</p> </sec> <sec id="pme1527-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions.</title> <p>In this study, long‐term opioids were frequently initiated for CNMP without a quality use‐of‐medicine approach. Potential sequelae are inadequate treatment of pain and escalating opioid‐related harms. These data suggest a need for improved resourcing and training in opioid management across pain and addictions.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Pain medicine. Volume 14:Issue 1(2013)
- Journal:
- Pain medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 14:Issue 1(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 14, Issue 1 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0014-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 62
- Page End:
- 74
- Publication Date:
- 2012-12-28
- Subjects:
- Pain -- Periodicals
Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Analgesics -- Periodicals
Pain -- Periodicals
Pain Management -- Periodicals
Douleur -- Périodiques
Douleur -- Traitement -- Périodiques
Analgésiques -- Périodiques
Analgésique
Soulagement de la douleur
Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme)
Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme)
616.047205 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1526-2375;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1526-4637 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=pme ↗
http://painmedicine.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01527.x ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1526-2375
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6333.806000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3328.xml