Wire‐guided biliary cannulation technique does not reduce the risk of post‐ERCP pancreatitis: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. Issue 3 (19th September 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Wire‐guided biliary cannulation technique does not reduce the risk of post‐ERCP pancreatitis: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. Issue 3 (19th September 2012)
- Main Title:
- Wire‐guided biliary cannulation technique does not reduce the risk of post‐ERCP pancreatitis: Multicenter randomized controlled trial
- Authors:
- Kobayashi, Go
Fujita, Naotaka
Imaizumi, Kazuomi
Irisawa, Atsushi
Suzuki, Masaki
Murakami, Akihiko
Oana, Shuhei
Makino, Naohiko
Komatsuda, Tomoya
Yoneyama, Kazuo - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="den1372-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>To evaluate the effect of wire‐guided biliary cannulation (WGC) on the prevention of post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP).</p> </sec> <sec id="den1372-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We investigated the impact of the WGC technique on the incidence of PEP by comparing the conventional cannulation (CC) technique in selective bile duct cannulation during ERCP with a cross‐over design in a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial and the potential risk factors for PEP. This involved six tertiary referral centers and three university hospitals. A total of 322 patients with indications for ERCP requiring selective biliary cannulation were enrolled from April 2008 to March 2009.</p> </sec> <sec id="den1372-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>One hundred and sixty‐three patients were assigned to the WGC group and 159 to the CC group. The incidence of PEP was the same between the groups (6.1% <italic>vs</italic> 6.3%, <italic>P</italic> = 0.95). Primary successful biliary cannulation was achieved in 136 patients (83%) in the WGC group and in 138 (87%) in the CC group (<italic>P</italic> = 0.40). The mean time required for primary successful biliary cannulation was 7.4 ± 8.3 min and 7.2 ± 7.9 min, respectively (<italic>P</italic> = 0.83).<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="den1372-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>To evaluate the effect of wire‐guided biliary cannulation (WGC) on the prevention of post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP).</p> </sec> <sec id="den1372-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We investigated the impact of the WGC technique on the incidence of PEP by comparing the conventional cannulation (CC) technique in selective bile duct cannulation during ERCP with a cross‐over design in a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial and the potential risk factors for PEP. This involved six tertiary referral centers and three university hospitals. A total of 322 patients with indications for ERCP requiring selective biliary cannulation were enrolled from April 2008 to March 2009.</p> </sec> <sec id="den1372-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>One hundred and sixty‐three patients were assigned to the WGC group and 159 to the CC group. The incidence of PEP was the same between the groups (6.1% <italic>vs</italic> 6.3%, <italic>P</italic> = 0.95). Primary successful biliary cannulation was achieved in 136 patients (83%) in the WGC group and in 138 (87%) in the CC group (<italic>P</italic> = 0.40). The mean time required for primary successful biliary cannulation was 7.4 ± 8.3 min and 7.2 ± 7.9 min, respectively (<italic>P</italic> = 0.83). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that accidental guidewire insertions and unintended injections of contrast into the main pancreatic duct were the only independent risk factors for PEP (<italic>P</italic> = 0.001, relative risk [RR]: 8.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.46–30.81).</p> </sec> <sec id="den1372-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>The WGC technique does not reduce the risk of PEP and also does not improve the success rate of selective bile duct cannulation.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Digestive endoscopy. Volume 25:Issue 3(2013:May)
- Journal:
- Digestive endoscopy
- Issue:
- Volume 25:Issue 3(2013:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 25, Issue 3 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 25
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0025-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 295
- Page End:
- 302
- Publication Date:
- 2012-09-19
- Subjects:
- Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Endoscopy -- Periodicals
Digestive System Diseases -- diagnosis -- Periodicals
Digestive System Diseases -- therapy -- Periodicals
Endoscopy -- Periodicals
616.3 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01372.x ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0915-5635
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3588.346200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4287.xml