A social relational critique of the biomedical definition and treatment of ADHD; ethical practical and political implications. Issue 2 (18th October 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wilson, Jim
• Is Part Of: Journal of family therapy. Volume 35:Issue 2(2013:May)
• Page Start: 198
• Page End: 218
• Publication Date: 2012-10-18
• Subjects: Family psychotherapy -- Periodicals; 616.89156
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2012.00607.x
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0163-4445

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), its existence and treatment, is a contentious matter. The dominant view in medicine considers that ADHD is a psychiatric disorder. My position is to challenge this from a social relational orientation. I explore here a critique of the psychiatric disease model of causation and treatment, particularly the use of medication. A series of prejudices based on a political and social constructionist orientation are offered to address the ethics, politics and practice implications of the practitioner critical of the biomedical model of diagnosis and treatment especially the use of medication. This device is employed in order to invite critical reflection and further debate in a field dominated by the medical and genetic arguments in support of ADHD as a psychiatric disease. The implications of more open debate are explored, together with directions for more politically and ethically informed practice with children and their families.</p> </abstract>