Randomized clinical trial of trigger point infiltration with lidocaine to diagnose anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome. Issue 2 (23rd November 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Randomized clinical trial of trigger point infiltration with lidocaine to diagnose anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome. Issue 2 (23rd November 2012)
- Main Title:
- Randomized clinical trial of trigger point infiltration with lidocaine to diagnose anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome
- Authors:
- Boelens, O. B. A.
Scheltinga, M. R.
Houterman, S.
Roumen, R. M. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1-1" sec-type="section"> <title>Background:</title> <p>Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) is hardly considered in the differential diagnosis of chronic abdominal pain. Some even doubt the existence of such a syndrome and attribute reported successful treatment results to a placebo effect. The objective was to clarify the role of local anaesthetic injection in diagnosing ACNES. The hypothesis was that pain attenuation following lidocaine injection would be greater than that after saline injection.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-2" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods:</title> <p>Patients aged over 18 years with suspected ACNES were randomized to receive an injection of 10 ml 1 per cent lidocaine or saline into the point of maximal abdominal wall pain just beneath the anterior fascia of the rectus abdominis muscle. Pain was recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS; 1–100 mm) and a verbal rating scale (VRS; 0, no pain; 4, severe pain) during physical examination just before and 15–20 min after injection. A reduction of at least 50 per cent on the VAS and/or 2 points on the VRS was considered a successful response.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-3" sec-type="section"> <title>Results:</title> <p>Between August 2008 and December 2010, 48 patients were randomized equally (7 men and 41 women, median age 47 years). Four patients in the saline group reported a successful response compared with 13<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1-1" sec-type="section"> <title>Background:</title> <p>Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) is hardly considered in the differential diagnosis of chronic abdominal pain. Some even doubt the existence of such a syndrome and attribute reported successful treatment results to a placebo effect. The objective was to clarify the role of local anaesthetic injection in diagnosing ACNES. The hypothesis was that pain attenuation following lidocaine injection would be greater than that after saline injection.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-2" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods:</title> <p>Patients aged over 18 years with suspected ACNES were randomized to receive an injection of 10 ml 1 per cent lidocaine or saline into the point of maximal abdominal wall pain just beneath the anterior fascia of the rectus abdominis muscle. Pain was recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS; 1–100 mm) and a verbal rating scale (VRS; 0, no pain; 4, severe pain) during physical examination just before and 15–20 min after injection. A reduction of at least 50 per cent on the VAS and/or 2 points on the VRS was considered a successful response.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-3" sec-type="section"> <title>Results:</title> <p>Between August 2008 and December 2010, 48 patients were randomized equally (7 men and 41 women, median age 47 years). Four patients in the saline group reported a successful response compared with 13 in the lidocaine group (<italic>P</italic> = 0·007).</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-4" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion:</title> <p>Entrapped branches of intercostal nerves may contribute to the clinical picture in some patients with chronic abdominal pain. Pain reduction following local infiltration in these patients was based on an anaesthetic mechanism and not on a placebo or a mechanical (volume) effect. Registration number: NTR2016 (Nederlands Trial Register; http://www.trialregister.nl). Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 100:Issue 2(2013:Feb.)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 100:Issue 2(2013:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 100, Issue 2 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 100
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0100-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 217
- Page End:
- 221
- Publication Date:
- 2012-11-23
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.8958 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3875.xml