A virtue less cloistered : courts, speech, and constitutions /: courts, speech, and constitutions. (2002)
- Record Type:
- Book
- Title:
- A virtue less cloistered : courts, speech, and constitutions /: courts, speech, and constitutions. (2002)
- Main Title:
- A virtue less cloistered : courts, speech, and constitutions
- Further Information:
- Note: Ian Cram.
- Other Names:
- Cram, Ian
- Contents:
- Half Title Page; Title Page; Half Title Page; Acknowledgements; Contents; Table of Cases; Table of Legislation; Table of Conventions and Treaties; Introduction; 1. Free Speech Rationales and Constitutional Landscapes; I INTRODUCTION; II RATIONALES FOR SPEECH AND THEIR RELATION TO COURT REPORTING/COMMENT; III CONCLUSION: AN ARGUMENT FROM GOVERNMENT INCOMPETENCE; IV CONSTITUTIONAL LANDSCAPES; VI JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS: SOME CONCLUDING THOUGHTS; 2. More or Less Different? The First Amendment and Article 10; I INTRODUCTION; II SOME STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES. III FREE SPEECH JURISPRUDENCE COMPARED-RATIONALES AND KEY FEATURES OF FIRST AMENDMENT AND ARTICLE 10 THINKINGIV US REGULATION OF SPEECH IMPACTING UPON JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS-AN OVERVIEW; V THE REGULATION OF COURT-RELATED SPEECH UNDER ARTICLES 6 AND 10 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS-AN OVERVIEW; VI A MORAL READING OF ARTICLE 10; VII CONCLUSION; 3. Speech and Criminal Jury Trials; I INTRODUCTION-TWO MODELS OF COURT-RELATED SPEECH REGULATION; II THE JURY IN ANGLO-AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEMS; III SCOTS AND ENGLISH APPROACHES TO PREJUDICIAL MEDIA COMMENT: FROM DIVERGENCE TO RAPPROCHEMENT? IV FREE PRESS AND FAIR TRIAL IN THE UNITED STATESV CANADA-RECONCILING FREE SPEECH AND FAIR TRIAL CONCERNS UNDER THE CHARTER; VI AUSTRALIA; VII TAKING SPEECH TOO SERIOUSLY?; VIII THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE CONSIDERED; IX CONCLUSION: RETURN TO ERA OF JURY AS PERSONS WITH KNOWLEDGE OF MATTERS AT ISSUE IN THE TRIAL; 4. For theHalf Title Page; Title Page; Half Title Page; Acknowledgements; Contents; Table of Cases; Table of Legislation; Table of Conventions and Treaties; Introduction; 1. Free Speech Rationales and Constitutional Landscapes; I INTRODUCTION; II RATIONALES FOR SPEECH AND THEIR RELATION TO COURT REPORTING/COMMENT; III CONCLUSION: AN ARGUMENT FROM GOVERNMENT INCOMPETENCE; IV CONSTITUTIONAL LANDSCAPES; VI JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS: SOME CONCLUDING THOUGHTS; 2. More or Less Different? The First Amendment and Article 10; I INTRODUCTION; II SOME STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES. III FREE SPEECH JURISPRUDENCE COMPARED-RATIONALES AND KEY FEATURES OF FIRST AMENDMENT AND ARTICLE 10 THINKINGIV US REGULATION OF SPEECH IMPACTING UPON JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS-AN OVERVIEW; V THE REGULATION OF COURT-RELATED SPEECH UNDER ARTICLES 6 AND 10 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS-AN OVERVIEW; VI A MORAL READING OF ARTICLE 10; VII CONCLUSION; 3. Speech and Criminal Jury Trials; I INTRODUCTION-TWO MODELS OF COURT-RELATED SPEECH REGULATION; II THE JURY IN ANGLO-AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEMS; III SCOTS AND ENGLISH APPROACHES TO PREJUDICIAL MEDIA COMMENT: FROM DIVERGENCE TO RAPPROCHEMENT? IV FREE PRESS AND FAIR TRIAL IN THE UNITED STATESV CANADA-RECONCILING FREE SPEECH AND FAIR TRIAL CONCERNS UNDER THE CHARTER; VI AUSTRALIA; VII TAKING SPEECH TOO SERIOUSLY?; VIII THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE CONSIDERED; IX CONCLUSION: RETURN TO ERA OF JURY AS PERSONS WITH KNOWLEDGE OF MATTERS AT ISSUE IN THE TRIAL; 4. For the Sake of the Children? Young Persons, Reporting Restrictions and Open Justice; I INTRODUCTION; II DOMESTIC PROVISIONS GOVERNING ACCESS TO AND REPORTING OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING YOUNG PERSONS IN ENGLAND AND WALES. III PRIOR RESTRAINTS-A FREEZE ON SPEECH? BICKEL AND HIS CRITICSIV YOUNG PERSONS' PRIVACY INTERESTS-ARGUMENTS AND COUNTERARGUMENTS; V THE ADVANCEMENT OF CHILDREN AND YOUNG PERSONS' PRIVACY INTERESTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW; VI NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEMS' TREATMENT OF PRIVACY CLAIMS; VII LESSONS FROM EUROPE-(I) ACCESS TO CROWN COURT PROCEEDINGS POST T v UNITED KINGDOM; V v UNITED KINGDOM AND (II) THE (IN)COMPATABILITY OF REPORTING RESTRICTIONS UNDER THE YOUTH JUSTICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT WITH ARTICLE 10 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS; VIII CONCLUSION. 5. The English Foolishness -- Scandalising the Courts and the Limits of Constitutionally Protected ExpressionI INTRODUCTION; II THE OFFENCE OUTLINED; III THE ENGLISH FOOLISHNESS ABROAD-THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SCANDALISING IN THE UNITED STATES, AUSTRALIA, CANADA AND UNDER THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS; IV CONCLUSION; 6. A Civil Law Comparison: Freedom of Expression and the Administration of Justice in Spain; 1 INTRODUCTION; II BURGOS 1970 AND AFTER; III THE 1978 CONSTITUTION-HUMAN RIGHTS IN A MODERN SOCIAL DEMOCRACY. … (more)
- Publisher Details:
- Oxford Portland, Or : Hart Pub
- Publication Date:
- 2002
- Extent:
- 1 online resource (xxxvi, 226 pages)
- Subjects:
- 342.08/53
Courts
Freedom of speech
Freedom of the press
Free press and fair trial
LAW -- Discrimination
LAW -- Civil Rights
Courts
Free press and fair trial
Freedom of speech
Freedom of the press
Electronic books - Languages:
- English
- ISBNs:
- 9781847311658
1847311652
9781280808906 - Related ISBNs:
- 128080890X
1841130389
9781841130385 - Notes:
- Note: Includes bibliographical references and index.
Note: Print version record. - Access Rights:
- Legal Deposit; Only available on premises controlled by the deposit library and to one user at any one time; The Legal Deposit Libraries (Non-Print Works) Regulations (UK).
- Access Usage:
- Restricted: Printing from this resource is governed by The Legal Deposit Libraries (Non-Print Works) Regulations (UK) and UK copyright law currently in force.
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD.DS.417130
- Ingest File:
- 02_522.xml