Moral expertise : new essays from theoretical and clinical bioethics /: new essays from theoretical and clinical bioethics. (2018)

• Record Type: Book
• Further Information: Note: Jamie Carlin Watson, Laura K. Guidry-Grimes, editors.
• Editors: Watson, Jamie Carlin; Gui-Grimes, Laura K
• Contents: Intro; Contents; Chapter 1: Introduction; 1.1 The Problem of Moral Expertise; 1.2 The Role of Clinical Ethicists; 1.3 Concepts and Distinctions; 1.3.1 What Is Expertise?; 1.3.2 What Kind of Moral Expertise?; 1.3.3 Political vs. Epistemic Authority; 1.3.4 Taking Experts Seriously; 1.3.5 Situational Authority vs. Expert Authority; 1.3.6 Is Morality Unique?; 1.3.7 What Is Moral Expertise About?; 1.4 Recent Developments; 1.5 Moving the Debate Forward: The Structure of This Volume; References and Further Reading; Chapter 2: Moral Expertise: A Comparative Philosophical Approach 2.1 Moral Knowledge as We Find It2.2 Intimacy or Integrity; 2.3 Intimacy and Integrity in Epistemology; 2.4 Moral Knowledge as Intimacy; 2.5 Sources of Moral Content; 2.6 The Relativism Worry; 2.7 Confucianism: A Brief Primer; 2.8 Relativist Worries Revisited; 2.9 The Junzi as Moral Expert: Some Lessons for Bioethics; References; Chapter 3: Ethics Expertise: What It Is, How to Get It, and What to Do with It; 3.1 A Defense of Expertise; 3.2 Reconsidering Ethical Expertise in Bioethics; 3.3 The Myth of Objective Neutrality; 3.4 The Messiness of Ethics Consultations 3.5 Expertise and the Clinical Ethicist3.6 Training; 3.7 Conclusion; References; Chapter 4: Why Moral Expertise Needs Moral Theory; 4.1 The Stakes of the Moral Expertise Debate; 4.2 Two Features of Moral Experts; 4.3 Theoretical Knowledge and the Epistemic Condition; 4.4 Theoretical Knowledge and the Testimonial Condition; 4.5 Conclusion; References; Chapter 5: Moral Experts, Deference & Disagreement; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Expertise; 5.3 Moral Expertise; 5.4 Non-Experts Identifying Moral Experts; 5.5 Moral Deference; 5.6 Normativity; 5.7 Accessibility; 5.8 Value Differences 5.9 Disagreements and Moral Expertise5.10 Conclusion; References; Chapter 6: Credentials for Moral Expertise; 6.1 Introduction; 6.2 What Moral Expertise Is; 6.3 The Proper Credentials; 6.4 Skepticism About Moral Reasoning; 6.5 Disagreement and Consensus; 6.6 Conclusion; References; Chapter 7: Can Moral Authorities Be Hypocrites?; 7.1 Introduction; 7.2 The Main Argument; 7.3 What Makes One a Moral Authority?; 7.4 The Argument from Systematicity; 7.5 The Argument from Trustworthiness; References Chapter 8: If There Were Moral Experts, What Would They Tell Others? Answers for Dilemmas from Early Chinese Philosophy8.1 Introduction; 8.2 Expert Advice from Confucian Sages; 8.3 Moral Expertise Advice in the Zhuangzi; 8.4 Conclusion by Way of Example: "Sophie's Choice"; Chapter 9: Moral Experts, Ethico-Epistemic Processes, and Discredited Knowers: An Epistemology for Bioethics; 9.1 Ontological and Epistemological Assumptions. Knowers, Experts, and Achievements; 9.2 Characteristics of an Ethico-Epistemology for Bioethics
• Publisher Details: Cham : Springer
• Publication Date: 2018
• Extent: 1 online resource
• Subjects: 174.2; Philosophy; Bioethics; Medicine -- Philosophy; BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Business Ethics; Bioethics; Medicine -- Philosophy; Medical -- Public Health; Public health & preventive medicine; Philosophy -- Ethics & Moral Philosophy; Bio-ethics; Electronic books
• Languages: English
• ISBNs: 9783319927596; 3319927590
• Related ISBNs: 9783319927589; 3319927582
• Notes: Note: Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed August 24, 2018)
• Access Rights: Legal Deposit; Only available on premises controlled by the deposit library and to one user at any one time; The Legal Deposit Libraries (Non-Print Works) Regulations (UK).
• Access Usage: Restricted: Printing from this resource is governed by The Legal Deposit Libraries (Non-Print Works) Regulations (UK) and UK copyright law currently in force.